Blueberry Funded
The Schedule is the gap. Clause 3.4 of the binding PDF says the Schedule is part of these Terms and may be provided to you separately via the Website — and the Schedule is currently rendered as the home page comparison tables. Every drawdown figure, profit target and price on this row came from the marketing site, not the contract. The firm sells six plans (4 static, 2 trailing-lock) with different daily limits, consistency rules and target ladders; merging any two would publish a rule the reader cannot find. Trading is demonstration only and there is no route to a live market; the PDF says so twice. Trustpilot withholds the rating and serves a fabricated-reviews warning.
The market and the marketing disagree on which Instant plan carries the smallest and largest size. The home page comparison table lists Instant Elite at seven sizes ($1.25K through $100K) and Instant Lite at five ($5K through $100K); the /instant/ page lists Lite at seven ($1,250 through $100,000) and Elite at five ($2,500 through $50,000). The dollar figures scale with size, so the missing $1,250 on Elite and the missing $100K on Elite are both prices a buyer would see in one place and not the other. Two of the six floors are labelled "Trailing Lock" without a published lock point — filed as `silent` rather than guessed from the daily-limit base, because the lock point is a different fact even when both are published on the same line. The Instant accounts also carry a "continuous performance validation" gate on top of the standard 14-day cycle, and what it costs a payout request is not stated. The 15% and 30% consistency rules on Instant Lite and Synthetic Indices have no consequence published either — what breaking the rule does is silent. Nine pages on the firm's own navigation return 404 (/rules/, /trading-rules/, /scaling/, /payouts/, /consistency/, /drawdown/, /prohibited-strategies/, /terms-and-conditions/, /outline-and-fees/), and the /faq/ page loads with the heading "Frequently asked questions" and the words "No FAQs found." below it. The help centre at help.blueberryfunded.com lists 102 articles in 11 categories but does not expose article URLs in the index.
Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.
Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.
Disqualified for
Trustpilot: fabricated-reviews warning
Trustpilot withholds the rating and serves a fabricated-reviews warning — a third party concluding the firm faked its own reviews. A low score is not this; every prop firm has angry traders. This is separate from having no legal entity: a firm can publish its registration number and still be caught doing it.
What they published
“The Schedule is incorporated into, and form part of, these Terms. The Schedule may accompany these Terms or may be provided to you separately (either as another document, via the Website or as part of other communications between you and the Company).”“Fees are charged for access to a simulated trading environment and evaluation framework. No real capital is allocated and no investment services are provided.”“All your Trades will be placed on the Trading Platform, which is strictly a demonstration only environment and not a "live" platform.”Plan by plan
6 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →
12% static floor and 12% profit target with no consistency rule and no minimum trading days — the roomiest single-phase exam on the site — but the highest one-time fee and only an 85% split. The funded Max Risk is 1% (2% with Add-On), no daily-limit lock point is published.
One exam, 10% profit target against 6% static floor and 4% daily, three trading days minimum per phase and a separate 0.5%-of-equity daily profit gate — three days on their own are not enough. Funded Max Risk is 1.5% with a 2% Add-On upgrade.
The marketing card calls this plan both "Elite" and "Prime 2-Step" in the same row. Two phases at 8% and 6% against a 10% static floor and 4% daily; same 0.5%-of-equity daily gate as 1-Step. The funded Max Risk line is blank — no per-trade risk rule published, only the 80% split.
Skip-evaluation funded account at $100–$1,500 depending on size, with a 10% "Trailing Lock" max drawdown whose lock point is not published and no daily limit. Five trading days minimum, 80% split, 1.5% funded Max Risk (2% with Add-On). The /instant/ page and the home comparison table swap which size Lite and Elite carry — a published contradiction.
The cheapest plan in the catalogue ($40–$750) and the only one with a consistency rule — 15%, with no consequence for breaking it published. 4% "Trailing Lock" max drawdown with no published lock point, 2% daily, no min trading days. 80% split, 1.5% funded Max Risk (2% with Add-On).
The sixth product sits below the cards on the home page with its own table and the subtitle "Synthetic indices trading only (Not valid for forex/stocks/metals)". 10% static max total loss, 4% daily on the higher of previous-day equity or balance, 10% then 5% profit target, three trading days minimum, and a 30% consistency rule with no consequence published. Copy trading is "Yes", prohibited strategies link is "Read More" and goes to a 404.
Trustpilot
score withheld by Trustpilot — this is the figure it computes but will not show
Trustpilot removed reviews it found to be fake and withheld the rating. This is not a low score — it is a third party concluding the firm wrote its own praise.
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
4/5
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
2/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
2/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $14.40/8
“Max Drawdown 12% Daily Drawdown 3% Profit Target 12%”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey state there is none.3/3
“Time Limit Unlimited”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey state there is none.2/2
“Min Days None”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target12%—
“Max Drawdown 12% Daily Drawdown 3% Profit Target 12%”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno change3/3
“Drawdown Type Static”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno change1/2
“Daily DD Calculation Higher of prev. day equity/balance”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit3%, measured on live equity, open trades includedno change0.60/2
“Daily Drawdown 3%”A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed12%no change1/1
“Max Drawdown 12%”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“Drawdown Type Static”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey state there is none.no change3/3
“Consistency None”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“If you satisfy the Evaluation Hurdles or the Company considers your Trading skills to be proficient and of high standards, the Company may (at its sole discretion) offer you a position as a Funded Trader. The Company may use other information available to it to assess your suitability to become a Funded Trader (including demonstrated trading history and expertise). An offer to become a Funded Trader is not guaranteed. Paying an Access Fee and participating in an Evaluation Outline (successfully or otherwise) does not oblige the Company to make you an offer to become a Funded Trader.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for money14 days2/2
“Payout Cycle 14 Days (7 Day & On Demand Available)”How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey state there is none.no change—
“News Trading Allowed (Subject to Policy)”Mandatory stop-lossrequired on every positionno change—
“Max Risk / Trade 1% (Eval & Funded) 2% available with Add On”Minimum time a trade must be heldThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Leverage1:30 → 1:2by instrument
no change—
by instrument
“Leverage 1:30 (FX), 1:10 (Index/Metals), 1:2 (Crypto)”Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growprofit · payouts taken · time elapsed — all of them—
“Simulated capital increments on the Blueberry Funded Account can occur every 3 months. To qualify for a capital increase, the trader must at least 10% net profit over 3 consecutive months. Additionally, the trader must process at least 4 payouts within the 3-month period.