Every number, with the firm’s own words.

FTMOWe would take it2 challenges · 10% static drawdown, no consistency rule on funded accounts, and the longest verifiable record in the categorynot read yet—10%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Earn2TradeWe would take it ⚑4 challenges · Earn2Trade is the only firm in the futures set that sells a genuinely fixed drawdown as an end stateno 100k—4–6%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

TopstepWe would take it ⚑1 challenge · The longest record in futures by a decade and the only firm here that publishes its own failure ratefrom $99review—4%max lossPass—PayoutBackingValue—▾

The Concept TradingWith reservations ⚑3 challenges · The strongest regulatory story of any near-miss here: the same entity at every stageno 100k—3–10%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Apex Trader FundingWith reservations1 challenge · We had this disqualified for intraday trailing, and that was wrong.not read yet—4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

My Funded FuturesWith reservations4 challenges · The floor freezesfrom $267review—4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

TheFuturesDeskWith reservations3 challenges · Topstep acquired it on 1 April 2026, and its own homepage footer now names Topstep Brokerage LLC.no 100k—not read yetmax lossPass—PayoutBackingValue—▾

FundedNextWith reservations4 challenges · Its own page says "News trading is allowed, with no restrictions on when or how you trade", then sets out the restriction: on funded accounts and on Stellar Instant, profit made in the five minutes around high-impact news is credited at 40% while a loss in that same window counts at 100%.not read yet—6–10%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Moneta FundedWith reservations6 challenges · Three of its plans are static outright and the two trailing ones stop: the trailing halts once the maximum loss level reaches the original starting balance, and from there the level is fixed and never climbs again.they are silent—0.3–8%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Nordic FunderWith reservations9 challenges · Traders report large payouts (~$8,000+) rejected while small ones clear normally, and an instrument-diversification requirement that was never disclosed upfront.from $367.515.2×the best3–8%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue▾

Axi SelectWith reservations ⚑1 challenge · Charges no fees at all, which is genuinely rare and means it cannot profit from your failure.none—7%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Breakout PropWith reservations ⚑4 challenges · Crypto-only, so it sits outside the CFD comparison this register was built for.no 100k—3–6%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Lucid TradingWe would not take it6 challenges · All six programmes read plan by plan on 28 July, at the $25,000 in each.no 100k—4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Redline Futures FundingWe would not take it3 challenges · Brand new in 2026 with zero reviews on its own profile as of Junefrom $19021.1×the best4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

FunderPro FuturesWe would not take it3 challenges · Three challenges from one pagefrom $149/mo—4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

HTHalcyon Trader FundingWe would not take it4 challenges · Three futures programs, not one: Lite trails on live equity and never freezes, Prime runs an end-of-day floor with a 40% consistency rule, and Dynamic lets the buyer pick between the two at purchase.no 100k—4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Swiss FirmupWe would not take it2 challenges · Launched February 2026from $9940.4×the best4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Rev One TradingWe would not take it1 challenge · One futures programme, Rev One Flex, in four sizes.from $20539.0×the best8%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

iFundsWe would not take it1 challenge · Plainly static from the initial balance, and there is no evaluation stage for a second rule to hide inno 100k—10%max lossPass—PayoutBackingValue—▾

Lux Trading FirmWe would not take it8 challenges · It sells one drawdown and publishes two, side by side, today.from $29920.1×the best4–6%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

MVFundedWe would not take it2 challenges · Sells itself as “powered by MarketsVox a fully licensed and regulated CFD Broker” while its own footer states MV Funded “is not regulated by any regulatory body” and is “entirely separate” from that brokerfrom $49920.0×the best6–10%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

PipcyWe would not take it4 challenges · Bans position sizes the firm calls "noticeably smaller or larger than those of the Customer's other trades" with no numeric thresholdfrom $42920.4×the best12%max lossPassPayout—BackingValue—▾

Darwinex ZeroWe would not take it4 challenges · Not a prop firm, and it says so itself.not applicable—not read yetmax lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Nexgen ProTrader FundingWe would not take it2 challenges · Read again on 13 September 2026, plan by plan, this time from the GitBook the firm runs its rules in and from the trader agreement it hosts as a PDF.from $34911.5×the best4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Purdia CapitalWe would not take it5 challenges · Five products sold from one configurator: Instant Funded (EOD), Static Instant Funded, EOD Evaluation, Pro Evaluation, and Pilot 001 Pioneer.from $199review3.9×the best3–3.3%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

RaiseMyFundsWe would not take it1 challenge · The pitch was that its regulated broker and the prop firm are the same companyfrom $49920.0×the best10%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Alpha FuturesWe would not take it4 challenges · One drawdown rule for all four products and both stages, and it is the good kind: it trails the daily close rather than live equity, and "Once the MLL reaches the initial starting balance, it won't continue to trail"from $239/mo5.8×the best3.5–4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

FundedNext FuturesWe would not take it6 challenges · The same end-of-day loss limit at both stagesfrom $129.9923.1×the best3–4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

FuturesEliteWe would not take it4 challenges · Four products sold across two contradictory rulebooks: Elite, Prime, Nitro, and Instant.from $293review—3.6–4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Traders LaunchWe would not take it5 challenges · Five one-step products across futures (NYC and 22-Hour sessions) and crypto.from $4920.4×the best1–4%max lossPassPayoutBackingValue—▾

Margin per $1 = size × max loss ÷ price, using the price the firm publishes for that size. “/mo” = the quote itself says it is monthly, and it is left out of Value and of the margin sort; “review” = the quote carries a discount or two prices. Win:lose = sum of the targets of every phase ÷ max loss; lower is easier. Value (only firms we would take or take with reservations) = how the challenge ranks against the others on those two numbers, at the chosen size. ⚑ = the hand-written verdict and the measurement disagree. The table shows the 72 firms read plan by plan and not disqualified; the other 80, with their reason, are in the list of all firms.