BluSky Trading
Disqualified for a forfeiture clause, not for its drawdown. Miss the seven-day window to complete brokerage onboarding and "all earned profit balances intended for the Live Brokerage transition will be forfeited" — the source account is closed and the money goes with it. On the floor itself we had recorded a switch from static to trailing on the Sim Funded account; the two rule pages we can actually read cover the evaluation and the brokerage account, and across those two the floor gets easier, not harder — trailing becomes "a static minimum balance", and the daily loss limit "has been removed from our BluLive/Funded accounts". The Sim Funded rules are a third page we have not been able to open, so that claim is withdrawn as unproven rather than kept as unsourced.
The deadline is not the only way profit disappears at the move to a live account: anything above the transfer ceiling does not carry over, and the balance is forfeited outright if the broker declines the application. Its own pages cannot agree on the funded minimum balance — one article says $100, a newer one says $26,500 — and the advertised 90/10 split applies to neither instant-funding plan.
Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.
Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.
Disqualified for
Deletes profit you earned
Money already earned is taken back under ordinary trading — the balance itself goes down. Where the line sits matters twice over: a disclosed, avoidable anti-abuse rule that bites tick scalpers and nobody else is a penalty on the scorecard, not this; and a payout that moves your drawdown without touching your balance is the bar above, which used to be filed here and was the wrong accusation.
What they published
“Forfeiture of Funds: All earned profit balances intended for the Live Brokerage transition will be forfeited.”Scorecard
9Trails, but only freezes far above your starting balance
The group holds a real licence, but you contract offshore
A per-request cap well below the account size
The contradiction takes money you already earned
Established, with a normal review profile
Each axis is scored 0–5 against a published scale. The line under each bar is the rung this firm landed on — not our summary of it, the scale entry itself.
The score is published anyway, because it is the honest picture: a firm can be strong on four axes and still be disqualified on one mechanism. A disqualifier is not a low grade — it is a rule we will not trade under at any price.
Plan by plan
1 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer.
The drawdown trails the highest intraday balance once funded, while the sales card discloses only the dollar amount and not the type.
Sold as static during the evaluation and switched to end-of-day trailing on the funded account, so the rule qualified under is not the rule traded under.
Drawdown behaves well, but profit above the transfer ceiling is erased at the move to a live account and forfeited outright if the broker declines the application.
Same erasure of profit above the transfer ceiling as Launch, on a longer evaluation.
A static floor paired with a 50/50 split for the first thirty trading days, which is a reduction of profit earned under ordinary trading.
Trustpilot
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
—
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
3/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
2/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit rises with the day's closing balancewe did not read this stageit does not move at all3/3
“The minimum trailing balance increases with your highest EOD balance. It increases with profits, but it does not decrease with losses, and is calculated from your starting balance at 6PM.”“static minimum balance that you must maintain”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Daily limitwe did not read this stageThey state there is none.we did not read this stage2/2
“This has been removed from our BluLive/Funded accounts. You can optionally set it with the brokerage for your own safety.”A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
What makes the loss limit rise (funded) · What the limit is measured against · What taking a payout does to the limit · Total loss allowed (phase 1) · Total loss allowed (funded) · Daily limit (phase 1)
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesthe largest position you may open drops1.80/3
“On the same note, the available contract limit can also decrease the lower your account balance gets.”The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Days before you can ask for money · What breaking the consistency rule costs (phase 1) · What breaking the consistency rule costs (funded) · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be heldThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
LeverageNo such thing in this plan.no change—
“We will not fail you for using too many contracts and we are able to automatically limit limit your max size if you are trading one product. But if you find a way to use more contracts than your terms, we will liquidate and/or restart your account and/or deny brokerage entry entirely when our system detects it”“Our system limits your max contracts and are safely rejected.”Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growprofit · their decision — all of them—
“Contract sizing in Sim Funded and Live Brokerage Accounts can be adjusted by opening a support ticket below, once you grow your Sim Funded and Live Brokerage Accounts in profit.”How large it can getNo such thing in this plan.—
“Project X scales up with account growth. Rithmic does not scale. Volumetrica does not scale.”Where the path endsat a real market—
“This Live Brokerage invitation is valid for 5 calendar days from issuance.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
The rules in writing
Could you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?
Where the rule that binds you is publishedin a help-centre article the contract never mentions1.20/4
“The minimum trailing balance increases with your highest EOD balance. It increases with profits, but it does not decrease with losses, and is calculated from your starting balance at 6PM.”If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.
Can it change the rules without noticeyes, and it says so0.60/3
“BluSky.pro reserves the right at any time to limit access to, modify, change, or discontinue the services of this site with or without notice to You”The clause that makes every dated verdict perishable, including ours. Near-universal, so not fatal.
We compared their own pages against each other and found nothing that contradicts.
Is the binding document dated
The company behind it
we did not read enough to sayIf it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.
The company you contract with · Where it is registered · Its registration number · That company owns the brand · The people behind it are named
The market
we did not read enough to sayDo your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.
What the funded account is · Conditions to reach a real market
We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.