All firms

Eightcap Challenges

READ · GRADED
Firm
CFD
Trading since
2025
Rules read
2026-08-04

Everything below traces to a sentence this firm published, saved on the date shown.

Read plan by plan on 4 August, and the finding is an absence: across twelve saved pages this firm publishes no loss limit, no profit target, no minimum trading days, no payout schedule and no challenge contract. The word drawdown appears zero times in all twelve. The single block it heads Condiciones carries the account range, the entry fee, a split ceiling, the duration, an instrument count, two paid add-ons and a platform list — eight rows, and not one of them is a limit. The legal index does not fill the gap: its own opening line scopes every document there to opening "una cuenta de trading real", and none of its four jurisdictions publishes a challenge rulebook. Four legal entities are named on these pages, three of them with a regulator and a licence number, and which one sells you the challenge is never said.

It sells three products — "Menos pasos de evaluación para que empieces a operar antes." (Una Fase), "La experiencia clásica con una capa adicional de evaluación" (Dos Fases) and "Desafíos personalizables de una hora" (Desafíos para Day Traders) — and only the first two are graded here. The Day Trader challenge has a dedicated page in the site menu that we did not archive, so not one of its blanks is charged to the firm. The conditions that ARE published cannot be attributed to a plan either: the three products are tabs of one component and only the default panel survived, so the account range, the entry fee and the "Reparto de beneficios Hasta el 90%" ceiling belong to no card in particular. That is not pedantry — the same block says "Sin límites de tiempo" while one of the three products it might describe is sold as a one-hour challenge, so attributing it would publish a sentence that is false of a sibling. Two corrections to this row, both from the reading: it used to grade the drawdown static, and the firm publishes no drawdown rule at all; and it used to name Eightcap International Ltd as the entity you contract with for Challenges, which no page we read says.

Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.

READ · GRADED

We read this firm plan by plan, and its numbers are published — they live in the derived evidence on its card, not in the five-axis sieve the tiers are ranked on. The grade here is the evidence itself: three answers and a payment-promise score, each computed from the firm’s own documents with a citation behind every input. What it does not have is the hand-written scorecard a tier requires.

watched since 2026-08-04

Graded from the evidence

Can you even pass?

Can you keep the money?

0/5

Is anyone behind it?

0/5

promise to pay — · we did not read enough to say

What they published

Behind the verdict above

Único Una Fase Menos pasos de evaluación para que empieces a operar antes. Clásico Dos Fases La experiencia clásica con una capa adicional de evaluación Más popular Desafíos para Day Traders Desafíos personalizables de una hora

2026-08-04 · eightcap.com/es/challenges · we saved a copy that day

Condiciones Tamaño de cuenta $5K - $200K Cuota de entrada Desde $69 Reparto de beneficios Hasta el 90% Duración Sin límites de tiempo Instrumentos disponibles 200+

2026-08-04 · eightcap.com/es/challenges · we saved a copy that day

Los documentos enumerados a continuación establecen las condiciones bajo las cuales se proporcionarán nuestros productos y servicios. Son documentos importantes y deben leerse y considerarse cuidadosamente antes de abrir una cuenta de trading real con nosotros. Rigen nuestra relación contigo.

2026-08-04 · eightcap.com/es/legal-documents · we saved a copy that day

Eightcap Global Limited, regulated by The Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) (SIA-F220) at registered address 201 Church Street, Sandyport, Nassau, Bahamas.

2026-08-04 · eightcap.com/es/challenges · we saved a copy that day

CLMarkets Limited (Número de Registro 24750) operando como Eightcap International, constituida en San Vicente y las Granadinas con el número 24750 IBC 2018 y domicilio social en Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, PO Box 1510, Beachmont, Kingstown, San Vicente y las Granadinas.

2026-08-04 · eightcap.com/es/legal-documents · we saved a copy that day

Plan by plan

3 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →

Una FaseOnly with eyes open

Sold on one sentence and nothing else: fewer evaluation steps, so you start trading sooner. No daily limit, no total limit, no target and no minimum days are published anywhere, at either stage, so a buyer cannot know what closes the account before paying — nor whether the rule changes when the account is handed over.

Not documentedConsequence unstatedNothing about getting paid is published: not when the first request is possible, not how often, not a consistency rule, and not what a withdrawal does to the loss limit. The shop sells an add-on called Pago Anticipado — early payout — against a normal schedule it never prints.
Dos FasesOnly with eyes open

The same silence, over three stages instead of two, because its own tagline concedes an extra layer of evaluation. It is also the card the page treats worst: the Condiciones block never appears under it at all, so this product is sold with a name, a badge and one sentence.

Not documentedConsequence unstatedIdentical to Una Fase, and from the identical source: the only page that publishes any condition of any challenge says nothing about when, how often or under what rule the money moves.

Trustpilot

4.13,820 reviews

profile read 2026-07-24 · eightcap.com

What this firm published

Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.

Can you even pass?

We have not read enough of this firm to answer.

Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.

0/5

Can you keep the money?

weakest measured: Maximum loss

The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.

0/5

Is anyone behind it?

average of the axes measured: 1

A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.

Una Fase

How hard the test is

we did not read enough to say
Coverage0% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

0 points earned, out of 0

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs

0/5

Maximum loss

Coverage90% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risephase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/3Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Where the limit stops risingall stagesThey do not say.Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

0 points earned, out of 9 · which gives 0/5

We have not read: Total loss allowed

Withdrawing

we did not read enough to say
Coverage40% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsfundedThey do not say.0/3Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

How long your money is theirs.

0 points earned, out of 8

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you

Dos Fases

How hard the test is

we did not read enough to say
Coverage0% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

0 points earned, out of 0

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs

0/5

Maximum loss

Coverage90% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risephase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change0/3Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Where the limit stops risingall stagesThey do not say.Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

0 points earned, out of 9 · which gives 0/5

We have not read: Total loss allowed

Withdrawing

we did not read enough to say
Coverage40% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsfundedThey do not say.0/3Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

How long your money is theirs.

0 points earned, out of 8

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you

Desafíos para Day Traders

How hard the test is

we did not read enough to say
Coverage0% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

0 points earned, out of 0

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs

Maximum loss

we did not read enough to say
Coverage0% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

0 points earned, out of 0

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: What makes the loss limit rise · What the limit is measured against · Where the limit stops rising · What taking a payout does to the limit · Total loss allowed · Daily limit

Withdrawing

we did not read enough to say
Coverage0% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

0 points earned, out of 0

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not read: Days before you can ask for money · Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · What breaking the consistency rule costs · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you

The rules in writing

we did not read enough to say
Coverage33% read

Could you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?

Where the rule that binds you is publishedThey do not say.0/4Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.

0 points earned, out of 4

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

We have not compared their pages against each other.

We have not read: Can it change the rules without notice · Is the binding document dated

The company behind it

we did not read enough to say
Coverage33% read

If it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?

The company you contract withphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/4Quote

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

With no named company there is nobody to sue.

0 points earned, out of 4

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

Normal for this whole industry

Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.

We have not read: Where it is registered · Its registration number · That company owns the brand · The people behind it are named

0/5

The market

Coverage100% read

Do your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?

What the funded account issimulated, with no route to real capital0/4Quote
Elige tu desafío de trading simulado.

The same sentence also answers: Conditions to reach a real market

The question that separates a firm that earns when you lose from one that earns when you last.

Conditions to reach a real marketNo such thing in this plan.Quote
Elige tu desafío de trading simulado.

The same sentence also answers: What the funded account is

Promising a route to a real market without publishing the conditions is promising nothing.

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

0 points earned, out of 4 · which gives 0/5

Normal for this whole industry

Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.

Plan by planon 2026-08-04· source: the firm’s own documentation

We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.