FundingTicks
Wound down, and its own notice is still up. It calls the wind-down a strategic decision and commits to refunding every active evaluation and funded account in full “irrespective of profit or drawdown status”, with reward splits of 80% and 90% honoured on accounts that had reached target.
This row accused it of the opposite: applying a December 2025 rule change — a one-minute minimum hold and reduced splits — retroactively to accounts that had already passed, “invalidating earned profit right before payout”. That sentence had no source, and the only document we have says traders were refunded in full. The rule change and the wind-down may both have happened; what cannot stand is our version of what the money did, printed as fact beside a published commitment that contradicts it. CLOSED is unaffected — the firm is winding down by its own account.
Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.
Disqualified for
The firm has closed
It stopped operating, and the date is on the row. Kept in the register rather than deleted so that somebody searching the name lands on when it closed instead of on an archived sales page. This is not a judgement of how it treated traders while it ran — several of these paid out to the end and shut down when a platform licence was withdrawn.
What they published
“Therefore, as a strategic decision, we are winding down FundingTicks’ operations.”“All active Evals and Master accounts will be refunded in full, irrespective of profit or drawdown status.”Trustpilot
We read its rules and scored it, but did not price every plan it sells individually.