FundYourFX
A Hong Kong company that names itself, its registration number and its street address, publishes one of the most detailed rule annexes in this register — and, between 4 August and 5 September 2026, rewrote it in the buyer’s favour. The charge this row used to lead with is gone: Schedule 1 was headed "Trailing Drawdown Model" and is now headed "Static Drawdown Model", the floor is fixed from the starting balance, and clause 3.1 publishes the daily and maximum drawdown of every programme instead of pointing at a shop page the firm may rewrite without notice. Three gaps survive and all three cost money: 1-Step and 2-Step advertise an 80% split against a contract whose structure is "starting at 50% and going up to 95%"; a "100% Refundable" badge sits over a policy that returns the fee only after three payouts totalling 6%; and the daily drawdown still has no published clock — a percentage with no reset hour and no reference balance. Two things also moved against the trader: the minimum trade life went from 45 seconds to 60, and the 1-Step withdrew its written promise of no minimum trading days.
Read plan by plan on 4 August 2026 from twelve saved pages, and re-read on 5 September from seven of them — on fundyourfx.io, because every subroute of fundyourfx.com answers HTTP 404 and the contract itself defines the site as www.fundyourfx.io. This row is now the second reading, and almost everything the first one charged the firm with, the firm went and fixed. On 4 August the binding document held no parameter at all: profit targets and drawdown limits were both delegated to the shop, under a clause 1.5 that lets the firm "amend, change or delete any content on our Website at any time and for any reason without any prior notice" while the contract itself gets seven days of warning. Clause 3.1 now names the daily and maximum drawdown of each programme in the contract; profit targets are the one exception and still point out to a help centre. Of the eight contradictions between its own documents, five closed: the floor turned static, clause 4.6 went from five business days to "typically processed within 24 hours", clause 4.3 stopped shipping with the template brackets "[Bi-weekly / Monthly]" in it and now names a cycle per programme, the Instant Funding target stopped being denied and started being explained — a payout threshold, not an exam — and the 2-Step stopped printing two different scaling ceilings on one screen. Three remain, and each costs money: the 80% split on the two evaluation pages against a structure "starting at 50%"; the "100% Refundable" badge against a policy that returns the fee only on "Completion of three (3) successful payouts that together total at least six percent (6%) profit."; and the daily drawdown, whose percentage is now in the contract and whose clock still is not — clause 3.4 says only that it is "monitored continuously". Two changes went the other way and are not swept up in the rest: clause 16.2 moved the minimum trade life from 45 seconds to 60, and the 1-Step page deleted "Trade at your own pace with no minimum trading days or hidden restrictions." A denial withdrawn is not the same as a rule imposed, and it scores like one. All three pages also stopped printing the "Leverage 1:100" they used to print twice each, and the contract fixes no figure — clause 22.4 forbids "Excessive Leverage" and leaves the judgement to them — so the leverage a buyer trades on is published nowhere. Rules that still appear on no shop page: a stop-loss within five minutes of every entry, no new position within five minutes of a release, three open positions in one direction. In its favour, and it is not nothing: the overnight and weekend permission is written down rather than left to be inferred, the consistency rule is denied on all four products, and clause 3.1 says without hedging that "We do not provide live trading, investment, brokerage, asset management, payment, custody or other regulated financial services to the public." No regulator anywhere, the trading is simulated, and the firm goes as far as saying even the charts are demo.
Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.
Judged, clean of all seven hard bars, and the scorecard still came in under the bar. Nothing here is an accusation — it is a firm we would not open an account with, and the card says on which axes it fell short.
What they published
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”“1-Step Classic: 4% daily drawdown and 6% static maximum drawdown;”“4.2. Reward Sharing Structure: We offer a dynamic Reward sharing structure, starting at 50% and going up to 95%.”“Any trade opened and closed within 60 seconds is a violation.”Scorecard
10Static at both stages — the floor never moves
No entity named, or the licence belongs to someone else
A lifetime ceiling, or a rule that can block payment
Two official channels disagree on a number that matters
Short history, or a sharply polarised review profile
Each axis is scored 0–5 against a published scale. The line under each bar is the rung this firm landed on — not our summary of it, the scale entry itself.
Plan by plan
4 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →
One phase, 10% to make against 6% to lose. This page still says nothing about the floor, so the contract is the only account of it — and since 5 September that account is a static limit, fixed from the starting balance and going nowhere, rather than one that rose with equity and never came back down. Both figures are now in the contract too, by programme name. No consistency rule and no time limit, both still denied in writing; the minimum-trading-days denial is NOT, because this page deleted it between the two readings and left a silence where a written promise used to be. Split published as 80% where the contract says the structure starts at 50%. Leverage published nowhere: the "1:100" this page printed twice in August is gone and the contract fixes no figure. Price not recorded: the page prints two bare amounts with nothing saying which is charged.
Two phases bought with two extra points of room — 8% to make against 8% to lose, the widest drawdown of the three evaluation products. This plan was marked "avoid" on one charge and one only: the table printed "Drawdown Static" while the binding Schedule 1 declared a trailing model twice, with no point at which it stopped climbing. On 5 September clause 3.1 is the static model the table had been selling, so the charge is gone and so is the verdict that rested on it. What remains is the 80% split against a contract starting at 50%, and a leverage figure the page stopped printing. The copy froze one set of figures under a header reading "Phase 1 Phase 2 Funded", so what phase 2 asks for is still unread — our gap, not theirs.
No evaluation: you buy the funded account, so every rule bites from the first trade. It is the one table that publishes the same split as the contract — 50%, where the two evaluations advertise 80% — which makes the product that looks worst on the shelf the one telling the truth. Both charges that put it on "avoid" closed on 5 September: the floor the table called static is what the contract now calls it too, and the "10% profit target" the contract used to deny is now explained by both documents in the same words — it is the profit you must reach before a payout request is eligible, not an exam. It is also the only plan here whose payout threshold is published at all. What is left is the daily limit: 4% in the contract now, and still no reset hour and no reference balance, on the one product where it closes an account you already paid for. Clause 3.2 does soften it to a soft breach here, which the two evaluations do not get.
NO LONGER SOLD. Everything below was read on 4 August and every citation still points at that copy, because that copy is the only one that holds these sentences: the URL now serves the generic Instant Funding page, and the contract of 5 September lists the programme as "Legacy 10X Quest Challenge (not available to new purchasers)". It stays on the row because the date a product stopped being sold is the most useful thing that can be said about it. What it was: a fixed prize rather than a split — 1% a day for ten consecutive trading days inside fourteen calendar days, and a reward of ten times the fee. The only plan here with a clock, the only one whose fee the table itself says is not refundable, the only one with an explicit "Daily Drawdown None" — a real absence rather than a silence, and to their credit — and the only product the contract singles out, banning grid trading on it alone in a clause the page never mentions. The 45-second minimum trade life and the ban on tick scalping sit oddly against a target of 1% a day.
Trustpilot
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
3/5
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
2/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
2/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $1.70.80/8
“10%
Profit Target”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey state there is none.no change3/3
“None
Time Limit”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.no change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target10%we did not read this stage—
“10%
Profit Target”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno change3/3
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno change1/2
“3.3. Consequences of Maximum-Loss Breach: If the static maximum drawdown or Nitro maximum-loss limit applicable to your programme is reached or exceeded at any time, whether through realised or unrealised losses:”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.no change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed6%we did not read this stage0.50/1
“6%
Max Drawdown”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey state there is none.no change3/3
“No
Consistency Rule”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“4.7. Discretionary Nature of Payouts – All Payouts are discretionary and are not guaranteed.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsyou may not open around a releaseno change—
“New Positions: No new positions may be opened within 5 minutes before or after a high-impact news event;”Mandatory stop-lossrequired on every positionno change—
“11.1. Mandatory Rule: A stop-loss must be set within five (5) minutes of opening any virtual trading position.”Minimum time a trade must be held60 secondsno change—
“Any trade opened and closed within 60 seconds is a violation.”Forced close before the weekendThey state there is none.no change—
“12.1. Permission: You are permitted to hold positions overnight and during weekends. There is no requirement to close virtual positions at the end of each virtual trading day or before weekends.”LeverageThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growprofit—
“You must have achieved the required virtual profit milestone;”How large it can get$6,000,000—
“Up to $6M
Scaling”Where the path endsat a larger simulation—
“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $14.40/8
“8%
Phase 1 Target”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey state there is none.no change3/3
“None
Time Limit”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target8%we did not read this stage—
“8%
Phase 1 Target”Trading days you must put in
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno change3/3
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno change1/2
“3.3. Consequences of Maximum-Loss Breach: If the static maximum drawdown or Nitro maximum-loss limit applicable to your programme is reached or exceeded at any time, whether through realised or unrealised losses:”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.no change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed8%we did not read this stage0.80/1
“8%
Max Drawdown”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey publish no ceiling.They state there is none.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“No
Consistency Rule”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“4.7. Discretionary Nature of Payouts – All Payouts are discretionary and are not guaranteed.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsyou may not open around a releaseno change—
“New Positions: No new positions may be opened within 5 minutes before or after a high-impact news event;”Mandatory stop-lossrequired on every positionno change—
“11.1. Mandatory Rule: A stop-loss must be set within five (5) minutes of opening any virtual trading position.”Minimum time a trade must be held60 secondsno change—
“Any trade opened and closed within 60 seconds is a violation.”Forced close before the weekendThey state there is none.no change—
“12.1. Permission: You are permitted to hold positions overnight and during weekends. There is no requirement to close virtual positions at the end of each virtual trading day or before weekends.”LeverageThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growprofit—
“You must have achieved the required virtual profit milestone;”How large it can get$6,000,000—
“Up to $6M
Scaling”Where the path endsat a larger simulation—
“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Days you have to finishThey state there is none.3/3
“None
Time Limit”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey state there is none.2/2
“Are There Minimum Trading Days? No. There are no minimum trading days on Instant Funding Classic.”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsNo such thing in this plan.—
“Instant Funded Account: Immediate access to simulated funding without requiring an evaluation phase;”A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit targetNo such thing in this plan.—
“Instant Funded Accounts have no evaluation target; a programme-specific payout threshold must be met before a payout request is eligible.”Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at all3/3
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades included1/2
“3.3. Consequences of Maximum-Loss Breach: If the static maximum drawdown or Nitro maximum-loss limit applicable to your programme is reached or exceeded at any time, whether through realised or unrealised losses:”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed6%0.50/1
“6%
Max Drawdown”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“3.1. Static Drawdown Model: Standard FundYourFX programmes use a static maximum drawdown. The maximum-loss threshold is fixed from the initial simulated account balance and does not move upward as equity or balance increases.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey state there is none.3/3
“No
Consistency Rule”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“4.7. Discretionary Nature of Payouts – All Payouts are discretionary and are not guaranteed.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first request10%0.40/1
“What Is the Payout Target? Instant Funding Classic has a 10% payout target. It is not an evaluation target.”How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsyou may not open around a release—
“New Positions: No new positions may be opened within 5 minutes before or after a high-impact news event;”Mandatory stop-lossrequired on every position—
“11.1. Mandatory Rule: A stop-loss must be set within five (5) minutes of opening any virtual trading position.”Minimum time a trade must be held60 seconds—
“Any trade opened and closed within 60 seconds is a violation.”Forced close before the weekendThey state there is none.—
“12.1. Permission: You are permitted to hold positions overnight and during weekends. There is no requirement to close virtual positions at the end of each virtual trading day or before weekends.”LeverageThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growprofit—
“You must have achieved the required virtual profit milestone;”How large it can get$6,000,000—
“Up to $6M
Scaling”Where the path endsat a larger simulation—
“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $0.18/8
“Profit Target 1% daily for 10 days”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finish14 days0/3
“Time Limit 14 days”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target1%—
“Profit Target 1% daily for 10 days”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit rises tick by tick, while you trade0.75/3
“The drawdown limit adjusts upward as your account equity increases;”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades included1/2
“3.3. Consequences of Breach: If the Drawdown Limit applicable to your programme is reached or exceeded at any time, whether through realised or unrealised losses:”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey state there is none.2/2
“Daily Drawdown None”A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed10%1/1
“Max Drawdown 10%”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey state there is none.3/3
“Consistency Rule No”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“4.7. Discretionary Nature of Payouts – All Payouts are discretionary and are not guaranteed.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Does that cap rise with the accountNo such thing in this plan.—
“5.1. Overview: Funded Users may progressively increase their virtual trading capital based on performance milestones through our Growth Plan.”Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Most one withdrawal can pay you
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsyou may not open around a release—
“New Positions: No new positions may be opened within 5 minutes before or after a high-impact news event;”Mandatory stop-lossrequired on every position—
“11.1. Mandatory Rule: A stop-loss must be set within five (5) minutes of opening any virtual trading position.”Minimum time a trade must be held45 seconds—
“Any trade opened and closed within 45 seconds is a violation.”Forced close before the weekendThey state there is none.—
“12.1. Permission: You are permitted to hold positions overnight and during weekends. There is no requirement to close virtual positions at the end of each virtual trading day or before weekends.”Leverage1:100by instrument
—
by instrument
“Leverage 1:100”Limit on position sizeThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growNo such thing in this plan.—
“5.1. Overview: Funded Users may progressively increase their virtual trading capital based on performance milestones through our Growth Plan.”How large it can getNo such thing in this plan.—
“5.1. Overview: Funded Users may progressively increase their virtual trading capital based on performance milestones through our Growth Plan.”Where the path endsat a larger simulation—
“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
The rules in writing
Could you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?
Where the rule that binds you is publishedin the document its own contract points at4/4
“By purchasing any programme, you confirm that you have read, understood and agree to be bound by the Trading Rules as they exist at the time of your purchase.”If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.
Can it change the rules without noticeyes, and it says so0.60/3
“We also reserve the right in our absolute right to amend, change or delete any content on our Website at any time and for any reason without any prior notice.”The clause that makes every dated verdict perishable, including ours. Near-universal, so not fatal.
Is the binding document datedThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Without a date you cannot tell whether the rule you read is the rule they apply.
Two official pages that disagree
the payout terms · costs money
“80–95%
Performance Split”“4.2. Reward Sharing Structure: We offer a dynamic Reward sharing structure, starting at 50% and going up to 95%.”the account size or the speed · costs money
“Are There Minimum Trading Days? No. There are no minimum trading days on Instant Funding Classic.”“Minimum Activity: At least one trade of 0.1 lots or more within each 30-day period;”the fees · costs money
“100% Refundable”“Completion of three (3) successful payouts that together total at least six percent (6%) profit.”whether the account reaches a real market · costs credibility
“Trade our capital. Never risk your own money.”“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”The company behind it
If it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?
The company you contract withFYFX Capital Limitedno change4/4
“These Terms of Service (“Terms“) govern the legal relationship between FYFX Capital Limited, a company incorporated in Hong Kong, (referred to as “FundYourFX“, “FYFX“, “we“, “us” or “our”), and any person who accesses our Website, creates an account, uses our services, or otherwise interacts with us (referred to as “you“, “your“, “User“, “Customer” or “Trader“).”“23.1. FYFX Capital Limited Unit 2A, 17/F Glenealy Tower, No.1 Glenealy Central, Hong Kong”With no named company there is nobody to sue.
Where it is registeredHong Kongno change1/2
“Subject to mandatory local consumer protection laws, these Terms and any dispute arising out of them are governed by the laws of Hong Kong.”“24.1. Prohibited Jurisdictions: (Hard Breach) Accessing the Services from a prohibited jurisdiction (currently Hong Kong, North Korea and Iran).”A claim in the Czech Republic and a claim in St Vincent are not the same claim.
Its registration numberwe did not read this stage75280952-0002/2
“FYFX Capital Limited · Hong Kong company number: 75280952-000”What turns a name into something checkable in a public register.
That company owns the brandyes2/2
“All trade marks, logos, trade names and other designations are our property or that of our licensors, and we do not grant you any authorisation to use them in any way.”Signing with a company other than the brand’s owner separates who sold to you from who answers to you.
The people behind it are namedThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Named people can be looked up. A company on its own cannot always be.
Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.
The market
Do your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?
What the funded account issimulated, with no route to real capital0/4
“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”The question that separates a firm that earns when you lose from one that earns when you last.
Conditions to reach a real marketNo such thing in this plan.—
“A Funded User trades only in a Simulated Account using a Simulated Account Balance (Virtual Funds) and is not allocated any real capital and is not allowed to place any trades in a real securities market.”Promising a route to a real market without publishing the conditions is promising nothing.
Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.
We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.