Lionheart Funding Program
Owned by Australian PropTradeTech, with no independent regulation disclosed and an up-to-95% split claim. Nothing verifiable stands behind the headline.
Judged, clean of all seven hard bars, and the scorecard still came in under the bar. Nothing here is an accusation — it is a firm we would not open an account with, and the card says on which axes it fell short.
Scorecard
11Trails, but only freezes far above your starting balance
No entity named, or the licence belongs to someone else
Workable, but a cap or a waiting period bites
Every page we read agreed with every other
Under a year, or too few reviews to mean anything
Each axis is scored 0–5 against a published scale. The line under each bar is the rung this firm landed on — not our summary of it, the scale entry itself.
Trustpilot
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
—
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
—
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
—
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
We have not read a single plan of this firm, so neither of the two axes that belong to a plan — the floor and the payout path — has anything under it yet.
The rules in writing
we did not read enough to sayCould you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
We have not compared their pages against each other.
Where the rule that binds you is published · Can it change the rules without notice · Is the binding document dated
The company behind it
we did not read enough to sayIf it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.
The company you contract with · Where it is registered · Its registration number · That company owns the brand · The people behind it are named
The market
we did not read enough to sayDo your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.
What the funded account is · Conditions to reach a real market
We read its rules and scored it, but did not price every plan it sells individually.