← All firms

Plutus Trade Base

DISQUALIFIED

Five products are sold and the binding document describes four. The 2 Step Challenge sits in the main navigation of every page with its own plan page and its own six-size price list, and the text of the Terms never mentions it; the FAQ answers that "PTB's Lightning, Freedom, and Adventure plans are all one-step", and the homepage sells the two-step product and then prints, further down the same page, "1-Step Challenge only. No two-step gauntlet on any plan."

CryptoRules read 2026-08-02122 quotes

Drawdown rules →Payout rules →

Seventeen saved pages, and the second finding is larger than the first: no page on this site says what any limit is measured against. The words equity, unrealised, floating, end-of-day and server time do not occur anywhere in the seventeen, outside two marketing lines about an "equity curve". So every measurement basis in its rules file is recorded as the firm's silence rather than guessed at — a floor that moves on an unpublished clock is a rule nobody can act on, and choosing the gentler reading for them is not ours to do.

Your account’s floor

The balance below which the firm closes the account. Each item with the firm’s own sentence. Read on the challenge: Lightning.

Maximum total loss · funded accountstated
4%
“Funded Profit target (payout) 7% Static drawdown 4% Daily loss limit 2%”
read on 2026-08-02 · plutustradebase.com · saved copy
Maximum loss in one day · funded accountthey are silent
we read that page and it does not sayread on 2026-08-02 · plutustradebase.com · saved copy
When the floor moves · funded accountstated
it does not move
“Once funded, Lightning has a 7% payout target, a 4% static drawdown, a 2% daily loss limit, a maximum 2% risk per trade, a 40% Best Day rule, and a 7 profitable-day requirement before your first payout.”
read on 2026-08-02 · plutustradebase.com · saved copy
What a payout does to itthey are silent
we read that page and it does not sayread on 2026-08-02 · plutustradebase.com · saved copy
your balancethe floor
A sketch of the kind of floor, without figures: the numbers are the ones beside it, each with its sentence.
DISQUALIFIED

Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.

watched since 2026-08-02 · last re-read 29d ago

Disqualified for

Trustpilot: fabricated-reviews warning

Trustpilot withholds the rating and serves a fabricated-reviews warning — a third party concluding the firm faked its own reviews. A low score is not this; every prop firm has angry traders. This is separate from having no legal entity: a firm can publish its registration number and still be caught doing it.

Trustpilot

3.91,148 reviewsTrustpilot: fabricated reviews

score withheld by Trustpilot — this is the figure it computes but will not show

Trustpilot removed reviews it found to be fake and withheld the rating. This is not a low score — it is a third party concluding the firm wrote its own praise.

profile read 2026-08-03 · plutustradebase.com

We have not re-read this profile since. Trustpilot lifts these notices, so treat the warning above as what we saw on that date, not as the profile today.

What this firm published

Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.

4/5

Can you even pass?

weakest measured: How hard the test is

Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.

2/5

Can you keep the money?

weakest measured: Maximum loss

The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.

2/5

Is anyone behind it?

average of the axes measured: 3

A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.

Lightning

4/5

How hard the test is

Coverage100% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $0.86.40/8Quote▶
“Challenge Profit target 3% Static drawdown 6% Min trading days None Best Day rule None Max leverage Up to 100x Time limit Unlimited”

The same sentence also answers: Profit target

A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.

Days you have to finishphase 1They state there is none.3/3Quote▶
“No. The Lightning challenge has no time limit — you can take as long as you need to reach the target.”

A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.

Trading days you must put inphase 1They state there is none.2/2Quote▶
“No Minimum Trading Days Start Monday, pass Tuesday.”

Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.

A second attempt costsa second attempt is discounted1/2Quote▶
“No mid-Challenge reset is provided. Following a Hard Breach, the Customer may be issued a reset code enabling the purchase of a new Challenge at a reduced price.”

A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.

Profit targetphase 13%—Quote▶
“Challenge Profit target 3% Static drawdown 6% Min trading days None Best Day rule None Max leverage Up to 100x Time limit Unlimited”

The same sentence also answers: How much you must win to survive

Recorded, not graded. It is on the page because the graded line above is computed from it, and a number you cannot see the inputs of is not an argument.

12.40 points earned, out of 15 · which gives 4/5

2/5

Maximum loss

Coverage100% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risephase 1it does not move at allfundedno change3/3Quote▶
“The Lightning challenge requires a 3% profit target with a 6% static maximum drawdown measured from your starting balance.”
“Once funded, Lightning has a 7% payout target, a 4% static drawdown, a 2% daily loss limit, a maximum 2% risk per trade, a 40% Best Day rule, and a 7 profitable-day requirement before your first payout.”

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Total loss allowedphase 16%funded4%0/1Quote▶
“Challenge Profit target 3% Static drawdown 6% Min trading days None Best Day rule None Max leverage Up to 100x Time limit Unlimited”
“Funded Profit target (payout) 7% Static drawdown 4% Daily loss limit 2%”

How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.

Where the limit stops risingall stagesNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Static drawdown is measured from the fixed starting balance; trailing drawdown follows the Account's peak and rises as the balance grows. Each plan states which applies.”

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

3 points earned, out of 10 · which gives 2/5

2/5

Withdrawing

Coverage100% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

Withdrawals before the account endsall stagesThey publish no ceiling.3/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.

What else a payout changesall stagesThey do not say.0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsphase 1They state there is none.fundedit cuts the payout0.60/3Quote▶
“On the Lightning Funded Account, no more than 40% of the Customer's total profit may derive from a single trading day at the time a Payout is requested. This rule does not apply during the Lightning Challenge.”
“Where the Company reasonably determines, acting in good faith on the Account's own logs and data, that a Payout results from such trading, it may decline or reduce that Payout, require further trading activity, or apply consistency-based conditions before the Payout is released. This applies on all plans, and automatic approval on Freedom Funded Accounts does not waive this right.”

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Can it refuse without giving a reasonall stagesyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3Quote▶
“Any Payout is a discretionary, performance-based reward paid from the Company's own resources and does not represent interest, dividends, or investment return.”

“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.

Days before you can ask for moneyall stages7 days2/2Quote▶
“You can request your first Lightning payout from day 7, once you have 7 profitable days, on demand — there is no extra waiting period.”

How long your money is theirs.

Most one withdrawal can pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.

Does that cap rise with the accountall stagesyes — a bigger account pays a bigger cheque2/2Quote▶
“A Customer who meets the performance criteria may request a Scale-Up — an increase in the simulated account size and corresponding Payout potential.”
Profit required before the first requestall stages7%0.70/1Quote▶
“Funded Profit target (payout) 7% Static drawdown 4% Daily loss limit 2%”

How much you have to make before you can touch anything.

Fee charged to pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/1Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

What they charge you to pay you.

8.30 points earned, out of 20 · which gives 2/5

—

How you may trade

recorded · not scored

Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?

Restriction around the newsphase 1They state there is none.fundedno change—Quote▶
“Lightning News trading permitted. EAs permitted for normal, non-HFT strategies. On the Funded Account: maximum 2% risk per trade (first occurrence a Soft Breach, second a Hard Breach) and the 40% Best Day rule at Payout.”
“Yes. News trading is permitted on Lightning, and EAs are allowed for normal, non-HFT strategies. Automated high-frequency trading via an EA or bot is not allowed.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Mandatory stop-lossphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Minimum time a trade must be heldphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Forced close before the weekendphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Leveragephase 11:100
by instrumentevery instrument 1:100
fundedno change—Quote▶
“Min trading days None Best Day rule None Max leverage Up to 100x”
“First Payout 7 days Leverage up to 100 up to 100 up to 100 up to 100 up to 100 Best day rule 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Limit on position sizephase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.

—

How it grows

recorded · not scored

What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.

What makes the account growprofit · time elapsed — all of them—Quote▶
“Eligibility. The Customer must achieve at least double the initial Profit Target (for example, 12% against a 6% target) while remaining fully compliant with the applicable risk limits for seven (7) consecutive days.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

How large it can getThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Where the path endsat a larger simulation—Quote▶
“All trading is conducted with virtual balances using market-replica data, for the purpose of evaluating skill and risk management.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.

Freedom

3/5

How hard the test is

Coverage100% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $1.32.40/8Quote▶
“The Freedom challenge requires a 5% profit target with a 5% static maximum loss, no daily loss limit, and 7 profitable days. There is no time limit, and leverage is up to 100x.”

The same sentence also answers: Profit target

A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.

Days you have to finishphase 1They state there is none.3/3Quote▶
“No. The Freedom challenge has no time limit.”

A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.

Trading days you must put inphase 17 days1.60/2Quote▶
“Your profit must come from at least 7 separate trading days . This prevents single-lucky-trade passes.”

Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.

A second attempt costsa second attempt is discounted1/2Quote▶
“No mid-Challenge reset is provided. Following a Hard Breach, the Customer may be issued a reset code enabling the purchase of a new Challenge at a reduced price.”

A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.

Profit targetphase 15%—Quote▶
“The Freedom challenge requires a 5% profit target with a 5% static maximum loss, no daily loss limit, and 7 profitable days. There is no time limit, and leverage is up to 100x.”

The same sentence also answers: How much you must win to survive

Recorded, not graded. It is on the page because the graded line above is computed from it, and a number you cannot see the inputs of is not an argument.

8 points earned, out of 15 · which gives 3/5

2/5

Maximum loss

Coverage100% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risephase 1it does not move at allfundedThey do not say.0/3Quote▶
“Stay above 5% max loss (static)”

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitall stagesnothing — the limit stays where it was2/2Quote▶
“Withdrawals don't shrink your buffer — your account keeps trading like nothing happened.”

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitphase 1They state there is none.fundedno change2/2Quote▶
“No. Freedom has no daily loss limit, in the challenge or once funded — only the maximum drawdown applies.”
“Once funded, Freedom has no profit target, a 4% trailing drawdown, and a 3% buffer your balance must cross before you withdraw profit above it. There is no daily loss limit.”

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Total loss allowedphase 15%funded4%0.25/1Quote▶
“Challenge Profit target 5% Static max loss 5% Daily loss limit None Min profitable days 7 Max leverage Up to 100x Time limit Unlimited”
“Funded Profit target None Trailing drawdown 4% Profit buffer 3% Payout approval Automatic, no review Max per payout Set by Skill Score”

How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.

Where the limit stops risingall stagesThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

4.25 points earned, out of 10 · which gives 2/5

2/5

Withdrawing

Coverage100% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

Withdrawals before the account endsall stagesThey publish no ceiling.3/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.

What else a payout changesall stagesthe consistency calculation starts over1.50/3Quote▶
“The Skill Score is calculated per trade (not per day) and resets after each Payout.”

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsphase 1They do not say.fundedit cuts the payout0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

“It sets the maximum amount withdrawable in a single Payout and does not determine whether a Payout is approved. It is calculated per trade and resets after each Payout.”

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Can it refuse without giving a reasonall stagesyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3Quote▶
“Any Payout is a discretionary, performance-based reward paid from the Company's own resources and does not represent interest, dividends, or investment return.”

“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.

Days before you can ask for moneyall stages1 days2/2Quote▶
“Day 1 you start withdrawing”

How long your money is theirs.

Most one withdrawal can pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.

Does that cap rise with the accountall stagesyes — a bigger account pays a bigger cheque2/2Quote▶
“A Customer who meets the performance criteria may request a Scale-Up — an increase in the simulated account size and corresponding Payout potential.”
Profit required before the first requestall stages3%1/1Quote▶
“On Freedom, the buffer (3%) is the cushion your funded balance must cross before you can withdraw the profit above it.”

How much you have to make before you can touch anything.

Fee charged to pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/1Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

What they charge you to pay you.

9.50 points earned, out of 20 · which gives 2/5

—

How you may trade

recorded · not scored

Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?

Restriction around the newsphase 1They state there is none.fundedno change—Quote▶
“Freedom News trading permitted. EAs permitted for normal, non-HFT strategies.”
“Yes. News trading is permitted on Freedom, and EAs are allowed for normal, non-HFT strategies. Automated high-frequency trading via an EA or bot is not allowed.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Mandatory stop-lossphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Minimum time a trade must be heldphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Forced close before the weekendphase 1nothing may stay open over the weekendfundedno change—Quote▶
“By default, positions are closed at the end of the daily session. If you swing-trade, add the overnight-hold add-on at checkout — it lifts that restriction and lets you hold through sessions and over weekends.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Leveragephase 11:100
by instrumentevery instrument 1:100
fundedThey do not say.—Quote▶
“Freedom offers leverage up to 100x.”

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Limit on position sizephase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.

—

How it grows

recorded · not scored

What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.

What makes the account growprofit · time elapsed — all of them—Quote▶
“Eligibility. The Customer must achieve at least double the initial Profit Target (for example, 12% against a 6% target) while remaining fully compliant with the applicable risk limits for seven (7) consecutive days.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

How large it can getThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Where the path endsat a larger simulation—Quote▶
“All trading is conducted with virtual balances using market-replica data, for the purpose of evaluating skill and risk management.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.

Adventure

2/5

How hard the test is

Coverage100% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $0.84.40/8Quote▶
“Account size $500,000 Profit target 4% Min trading days 30”

The same sentence also answers: Profit target

A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.

Days you have to finishphase 1They do not say.0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.

Trading days you must put inphase 130 days0.50/2Quote▶
“The Adventure challenge requires an 4% profit target over a minimum of 30 trading days, with a $10,000 Static drawdown and a 5% stable daily average so that no single day dominates your result.”

Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.

A second attempt costsa second attempt is discounted1/2Quote▶
“No mid-Challenge reset is provided. Following a Hard Breach, the Customer may be issued a reset code enabling the purchase of a new Challenge at a reduced price.”

A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.

Profit targetphase 14%—Quote▶
“Account size $500,000 Profit target 4% Min trading days 30”

The same sentence also answers: How much you must win to survive

Recorded, not graded. It is on the page because the graded line above is computed from it, and a number you cannot see the inputs of is not an argument.

5.90 points earned, out of 15 · which gives 2/5

1/5

Maximum loss

Coverage100% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risephase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstphase 1They do not say.fundedno change0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitphase 1They publish no ceiling.fundedThey state there is none.2/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

“No. On Adventure, 'freedom' means there is no daily loss limit once funded — it does not mean the account is unrestricted. The 5% trailing drawdown and the trading rules still apply, and a drawdown or rule breach ends the account.”

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Total loss allowedphase 15%fundedno change0.25/1Quote▶
“Max total drawdown 5% trailing Stable daily average 5%”
“Daily loss limit None Max total drawdown 5% trailing (applies)”

How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.

Where the limit stops risingall stagesThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

2.25 points earned, out of 10 · which gives 1/5

2/5

Withdrawing

Coverage100% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

Withdrawals before the account endsall stagesThey publish no ceiling.3/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.

What else a payout changesall stagesThey do not say.0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsphase 1They do not say.fundedit cuts the payout0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

“Where the Company reasonably determines, acting in good faith on the Account's own logs and data, that a Payout results from such trading, it may decline or reduce that Payout, require further trading activity, or apply consistency-based conditions before the Payout is released. This applies on all plans, and automatic approval on Freedom Funded Accounts does not waive this right.”

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Can it refuse without giving a reasonall stagesyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3Quote▶
“Any Payout is a discretionary, performance-based reward paid from the Company's own resources and does not represent interest, dividends, or investment return.”

“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.

Days before you can ask for moneyall stagesThey state there is none.2/2Quote▶
“Withdrawals on Adventure are available anytime once funded.”

How long your money is theirs.

Most one withdrawal can pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.

Does that cap rise with the accountall stagesyes — a bigger account pays a bigger cheque2/2Quote▶
“A Customer who meets the performance criteria may request a Scale-Up — an increase in the simulated account size and corresponding Payout potential.”
Profit required before the first requestall stagesThey do not say.0/1Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

How much you have to make before you can touch anything.

Fee charged to pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/1Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

What they charge you to pay you.

7 points earned, out of 20 · which gives 2/5

—

How you may trade

recorded · not scored

Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?

Restriction around the newsphase 1news trading is banned outrightfundedno change—Quote▶
“Adventure News trading not permitted. High-frequency trading not permitted. Copy trading not permitted. EAs permitted only for normal, non-HFT strategies.”
“No. News trading is not permitted on the Adventure plan.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Mandatory stop-lossphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Minimum time a trade must be heldphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Forced close before the weekendphase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Leveragephase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Limit on position sizephase 1They do not say.fundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.

—

How it grows

recorded · not scored

What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.

What makes the account growprofit · time elapsed — all of them—Quote▶
“Eligibility. The Customer must achieve at least double the initial Profit Target (for example, 12% against a 6% target) while remaining fully compliant with the applicable risk limits for seven (7) consecutive days.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

How large it can getThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Where the path endsat a larger simulation—Quote▶
“All trading is conducted with virtual balances using market-replica data, for the purpose of evaluating skill and risk management.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.

2 Step Challenge

3/5

How hard the test is

Coverage100% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

How much you must win to surviveall stagesfor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $0.84.40/8Quote▶
“Profit Target Phase 1 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%”

The same sentence also answers: Profit target

A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.

Days you have to finishphase 1They state there is none.phase 2no change3/3Quote▶
“No. Most PTB challenges do not have a time limit, allowing traders to progress at their own pace while respecting the trading rules. The only exception is the Adventure plan, which includes a time limit.”
“Profit target 6% Daily drawdown 5% Max drawdown 10% trailing Min trading days 4 Max leverage Up to 100× Time limit Unlimited”

A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.

Trading days you must put inphase 14 daysphase 2no change2/2Quote▶
“Minimum Trading Days 4 4 4 4 4 4”

Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.

A second attempt costsall stagesa second attempt is discounted1/2Quote▶
“No mid-Challenge reset is provided. Following a Hard Breach, the Customer may be issued a reset code enabling the purchase of a new Challenge at a reduced price.”

A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.

Profit targetphase 18%phase 26%—Quote▶
“Profit Target Phase 1 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%”

The same sentence also answers: How much you must win to survive

“Profit Target Phase 2 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6%”

Recorded, not graded. It is on the page because the graded line above is computed from it, and a number you cannot see the inputs of is not an argument.

10.40 points earned, out of 15 · which gives 3/5

1/5

Maximum loss

Coverage100% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risephase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Total loss allowedphase 112%phase 2no changefunded10%1/1Quote▶
“Max Total Drawdown 12% 12% 12% 12% 10% 8%”
“Max Total Drawdown 10% 10% 10% 10% 8% 6%”

How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.

Where the limit stops risingall stagesThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

1 points earned, out of 10 · which gives 1/5

1/5

Withdrawing

Coverage100% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

Withdrawals before the account endsall stagesThey publish no ceiling.3/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.

What else a payout changesall stagesThey do not say.0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedit cuts the payout0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

“Where the Company reasonably determines, acting in good faith on the Account's own logs and data, that a Payout results from such trading, it may decline or reduce that Payout, require further trading activity, or apply consistency-based conditions before the Payout is released. This applies on all plans, and automatic approval on Freedom Funded Accounts does not waive this right.”

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Can it refuse without giving a reasonall stagesyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3Quote▶
“Any Payout is a discretionary, performance-based reward paid from the Company's own resources and does not represent interest, dividends, or investment return.”

“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.

Days before you can ask for moneyall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

How long your money is theirs.

Most one withdrawal can pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.

Does that cap rise with the accountall stagesyes — a bigger account pays a bigger cheque2/2Quote▶
“A Customer who meets the performance criteria may request a Scale-Up — an increase in the simulated account size and corresponding Payout potential.”
Profit required before the first requestall stages7%0.70/1Quote▶
“Profit Target 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7%”

How much you have to make before you can touch anything.

Fee charged to pay youall stagesThey do not say.0/1Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

What they charge you to pay you.

5.70 points earned, out of 20 · which gives 1/5

—

How you may trade

recorded · not scored

Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?

Restriction around the newsphase 1They state there is none.phase 2no changefundedThey do not say.—Quote▶
“News & Expert Advisors Automate, hedge, trade news. The strategies professionals actually run are welcome here.”
“Full Strategy Set News, EAs, any strategy - all welcome.”

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Mandatory stop-lossphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Minimum time a trade must be heldphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Forced close before the weekendphase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Leveragephase 11:100
by instrumentevery instrument 1:100
phase 2no changefundedThey do not say.—Quote▶
“Min trading days 4 Max leverage Up to 100× Time limit Unlimited”
“Profit target 6% Daily drawdown 5% Max drawdown 10% trailing Min trading days 4 Max leverage Up to 100×”

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Limit on position sizephase 1They do not say.phase 2no changefundedno change—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.

—

How it grows

recorded · not scored

What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.

What makes the account growprofit · time elapsed — all of them—Quote▶
“Eligibility. The Customer must achieve at least double the initial Profit Target (for example, 12% against a 6% target) while remaining fully compliant with the applicable risk limits for seven (7) consecutive days.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

How large it can getThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Where the path endsat a larger simulation—Quote▶
“All trading is conducted with virtual balances using market-replica data, for the purpose of evaluating skill and risk management.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.

Instant Funding

—

How hard the test is

we did not read enough to say
Coverage0% read

Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.

How much you must win to surviveNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Instant No Challenge Funded Account without an evaluation phase.”

The same sentence also answers: Profit target · A second attempt costs

A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

Days you have to finishphase 1No such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Evaluation phase None Wait time before trading None”

A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

Trading days you must put inphase 1No such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“No. Instant has no challenge — you start on a funded account immediately after purchase.”

Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

A second attempt costsNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Instant No Challenge Funded Account without an evaluation phase.”

The same sentence also answers: How much you must win to survive · Profit target

A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

Profit targetphase 1No such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Instant No Challenge Funded Account without an evaluation phase.”

The same sentence also answers: How much you must win to survive · A second attempt costs

Recorded, not graded. It is on the page because the graded line above is computed from it, and a number you cannot see the inputs of is not an argument.

0 points earned, out of 0

Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.

1/5

Maximum loss

Coverage100% read

The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?

What makes the loss limit risefundedThey do not say.0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.

What the limit is measured againstfundedThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.

What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.

Daily limitfundedThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.

Total loss allowedfunded10%1/1Quote▶
“Funded from the outset Evaluation None Trailing drawdown 10%”

How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.

Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.

Recorded, not graded, and no score on this axis is computed from it. It is on the page because the firm published it, and a reader choosing between two plans should be able to read it without taking our word for what it says.

1 points earned, out of 10 · which gives 1/5

2/5

Withdrawing

Coverage100% read

How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.

Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.

What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.

What breaking the consistency rule costsfundedit cuts the payout0.60/3Quote▶
“Where the Company reasonably determines, acting in good faith on the Account's own logs and data, that a Payout results from such trading, it may decline or reduce that Payout, require further trading activity, or apply consistency-based conditions before the Payout is released. This applies on all plans, and automatic approval on Freedom Funded Accounts does not waive this right.”

Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.

Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3Quote▶
“Any Payout is a discretionary, performance-based reward paid from the Company's own resources and does not represent interest, dividends, or investment return.”

“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.

Days before you can ask for money7 days2/2Quote▶
“Min trading days (payout) 7 Max leverage Up to 50x News / EAs / HFT / weekend With Add ons First payout After 7 days”

How long your money is theirs.

Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.

Does that cap rise with the accountNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Yes. If you achieve at least double the initial profit target (for example 12% against a 6% target) while staying fully compliant for seven consecutive days, you can request a Scale-Up by emailing support. On approval your balance is increased with new drawdown and targets. Instant plans are excluded unless offered in writing.”

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

Profit required before the first request5%1/1Quote▶
“Day 1 Funded 5% Profit Target 7 Days First Payout 90% Profit Split”

How much you have to make before you can touch anything.

Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

What they charge you to pay you.

6.60 points earned, out of 18 · which gives 2/5

—

How you may trade

recorded · not scored

Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?

Restriction around the newsfundednews trading is banned outright—Quote▶
“Instant News trading, EAs and bots, high-frequency trading, and weekend holding are not permitted.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Mandatory stop-lossfundedThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Minimum time a trade must be heldfundedThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Forced close before the weekendfundednothing may stay open over the weekend—Quote▶
“On Instant, news trading, EAs and bots, high-frequency trading, and holding positions over the weekend are not permitted.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Leveragefunded1:50
by instrumentevery instrument 1:50
—Quote▶
“Min trading days (payout) 7 Max leverage Up to 50x”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Limit on position sizefundedThey do not say.—Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.

—

How it grows

recorded · not scored

What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.

What makes the account growNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Exclusions. Instant plans are excluded from scaling unless expressly offered in writing.”

The same sentence also answers: How large it can get

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

How large it can getNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“Exclusions. Instant plans are excluded from scaling unless expressly offered in writing.”

The same sentence also answers: What makes the account grow

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

Where the path endsat a larger simulation—Quote▶
“All trading is conducted with virtual balances using market-replica data, for the purpose of evaluating skill and risk management.”

Recorded, not graded — there is no number in this block for it to feed. It is here because the firm published it and a reader deciding between two plans should not have to take our word for what it says.

One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.

3/5

The rules in writing

Coverage100% read

Could you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?

Where the rule that binds you is publishedin the document its own contract points at4/4Quote▶
“Order of precedence. In the event of conflict between a plan page and these Terms, these Terms prevail unless the plan page expressly provides otherwise for that plan.”

If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.

Can it change the rules without noticeyes, and it says so0.60/3Quote▶
“The Company may correct any error or omission and update information at any time without prior notice.”

The clause that makes every dated verdict perishable, including ours. Near-universal, so not fatal.

Is the binding document datedyes2/2Quote▶
“Effective: June 2, 2026 • Last reviewed: June 2, 2026”

Without a date you cannot tell whether the rule you read is the rule they apply.

6.60 points earned, out of 12 · which gives 3/5

Two official pages that disagree

the profit target · costs money

“Account size $500,000 Profit target 4% Min trading days 30”
“8% One-Step Target One challenge, one number to hit.”

the drawdown rule · costs money

“Static 4% Drawdown A fixed safety line you never have to recalculate. The number you see is the number that stays.”
“Funded from the outset Evaluation None Trailing drawdown 10%”

the payout terms · costs money

“Profit split 70% (95% with add-on)”
“Profit-Split Add-On (Lightning). Increases the Lightning profit split from 80% to 95%.”

the fees · costs money

“Account size One-time fee $10,000 €99”
“Total One-time fee · pay once €89.00”

the fees · costs money

“Plan & size One-time fee Adventure — $500,000 €59 Instant — $5,000 €87 Instant — $10,000 €167 Instant — $20,000 €319 Instant — $50,000 €691”
“One Time Fee €49 €328 €149 €1198 €259 €1650 €399 €628 €749 €1650”

the drawdown rule · costs money

“The Adventure Plan is designed for seasoned traders who thrive on freedom. With no rules or restrictions, it offers the ultimate trading experience. You can withdraw funds anytime, with no limits on how much or how often.”
“It does not mean the Account is unrestricted. On every Funded Account, the plan's maximum drawdown continues to apply, and the trading rules in the "Trading rules" section remain in force throughout — including, on Adventure, that news trading, high-frequency trading, and copy trading are not permitted.”

the consistency rule · costs money

“Max total drawdown 5% trailing Stable daily average 5%”
“Min Trading Days 30 Stable Daily Average 0.2%”

the profit target · costs money

“Profit Target 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7%”
“Profit target for payout None Daily loss limit 5% Max drawdown 10% trailing Withdrawals Every 14 days Scaling Available Profit split Up to 95%”

the payout terms · costs money

“FAST PAYOUTS WITHOUT MINIMUM”
“The minimum withdrawal is $100.”

whether the account reaches a real market · costs credibility

“Go live on day one with a real funded account and start earning from your very first trade - no phases, no resets.”
“No live-market order is placed on the Customer's Account, and the Customer does not deposit trading capital or risk personal funds in the market.”

the drawdown rule · costs money

“Max Daily Drawdown 7% 7% 7% 7% 5% 4%”
“Profit target 8% Daily drawdown 5% Max drawdown 10% trailing Min trading days 4”

the payout terms · costs money

“A $500,000 funded account for €59. One step, 8% target, and up to 90% profit split the moment you pass.”
“Adventure pays up to a 95% profit split.”

the fees · costs money

“Pricing — two-step payment Size At purchase On pass Total $10K €99 €99 €198”
“No activation fee applies to the Freedom, Adventure or Instant plans.”
3/5

The company behind it

Coverage100% read

If it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?

The company you contract withphase 1Triple Edge Group LTDfundedno change4/4Quote▶
“Triple Edge Group LTD , incorporated in the Republic of Cyprus (Company No. HE465348), registered at Omirou & Nikis, PAKOVA CENTRE, Block A, 2nd Floor, Office 205, 3095 Limassol, Cyprus, provides the educational and evaluation services and operates the TradeLocker, cTrader, Match Trader, DXtrade, and TradingView platforms.”
“Triple Edge Group LTD (Cyprus) is responsible for the educational and evaluation services, billing and support, and the TradeLocker, cTrader, Match Trader, DXtrade, and TradingView platforms.”

With no named company there is nobody to sue.

Where it is registeredphase 1Cyprusfundedno change1/2Quote▶
“The educational and evaluation services, billing, support, and the TradeLocker, cTrader, Match Trader, DXtrade, and TradingView platforms (provided by Triple Edge Group LTD) are governed by the laws of Cyprus and are subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of Cyprus.”

A claim in the Czech Republic and a claim in St Vincent are not the same claim.

Its registration numberphase 1HE465348fundedno change2/2Quote▶
“This website is operated and managed by Triple Edge Group LTD, a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus (Company No. HE465348).”
“2026 Triple Edge Group LTD Limassol, Cyprus Reg. HE 465348”

What turns a name into something checkable in a public register.

That company owns the brandall stagesno — the brand sits elsewhere0.40/2Quote▶
“PlutusTradeBase (PTB) is a registered brand owned by PTB Plutus TradeBase LTD (Saint Lucia) and operated under exclusive license by Triple Edge Group LTD (Cyprus).”

Signing with a company other than the brand’s owner separates who sold to you from who answers to you.

The people behind it are namedall stagesThey do not say.0/2Quote▶

we read the page that should answer this and it does not

Named people can be looked up. A company on its own cannot always be.

7.40 points earned, out of 12 · which gives 3/5

Normal for this whole industry

Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.

0/5

The market

Coverage100% read

Do your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?

What the funded account issimulated, with no route to real capital0/4Quote▶
“No live-market order is placed on the Customer's Account, and the Customer does not deposit trading capital or risk personal funds in the market.”

The same sentence also answers: Conditions to reach a real market

The question that separates a firm that earns when you lose from one that earns when you last.

Conditions to reach a real marketNo such thing in this plan.—Quote▶
“No live-market order is placed on the Customer's Account, and the Customer does not deposit trading capital or risk personal funds in the market.”

The same sentence also answers: What the funded account is

Promising a route to a real market without publishing the conditions is promising nothing.

Out of the total entirely, not merely unscored. A question with no referent here must not make the axis look thinner than it was read.

0 points earned, out of 4 · which gives 0/5

Normal for this whole industry

Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.

Plan by planon 2026-08-02· source: the firm’s own documentation

We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.