Quant Tekel
It publishes the number that closes the account twice, four points apart, on the same domain on the same day: the rules table on its prop home page gives QT 2 Step "4% daily drawdown, 10% max drawdown" and the checkout card for that same plan gives "Daily Drawdown 3% Max Drawdown 6%". Neither page acknowledges the other. What no page publishes at all is what any of its floors is measured against — "equity", "initial balance", "starting balance" and "end of day" do not appear once in the twenty pages saved on 4 August — so not one of its five plans has a statable daily loss limit. Its checkout footer then names two different providers of one service four paragraphs apart, "All QTFunded services are provided by Quant Tekel SVG (St. Vincent and the Grenadines), an offshore entity" and "Quant Tekel LLC – 3984 LLC 2025 provides virtual proprietary trading programs", neither with a registration number; the only group company that has one is the brokerage, whose own FAQ says "quanttekel.com does not offer prop trading evaluations".
PROFIT_DELETE stands, on a sentence that is real, identical in all four saved copies of the terms, and that does not fire on trading at all. Under the heading "Client Account Inactivity and KYC Verification Policy" the terms say a client without "the most recent and up-to-date" KYC verification does not hold an active account, and that "any profit accrued before completion of the KYC process, will be void" — money already earned, annulled on a paperwork state whose goalposts the firm itself moves. Two limits belong beside it and neither retracts it: those are the BROKERAGE's terms, which name Quant Tekel (Pty) Limited as the Company, and no contract for the prop programme could be obtained at all; and on the prop side the only forfeiture clause is a stated penalty for named conduct, "Prohibited strategies, platform or IP violations". Two claims this row used to make are withdrawn for want of a page: the four plans graded static, and the sentence QT Instant's verdict rested on, about a trailing floor locking at the starting balance when a withdrawal is made. Neither string is in any of the twenty saved pages. What the firm does publish is "6% trailing max drawdown" for QT Instant and "3% daily trailing drawdown, 6% max trailing drawdown" for QT 1 Step, with no stopping point for either — which is not enough to name DD_NO_FREEZE, because an unpublished freeze is a silence and a silence is not a mechanism.
Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.
Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.
Disqualified for
Deletes profit you earned
Money already earned is taken back under ordinary trading — the balance itself goes down. Where the line sits matters twice over: a disclosed, avoidable anti-abuse rule that bites tick scalpers and nobody else is a penalty on the scorecard, not this; and a payout that moves your drawdown without touching your balance is the bar above, which used to be filed here and was the wrong accusation.
What they published
“Consequently, any trades executed or profits accrued by such a client shall be considered invalid and unenforceable. Furthermore, any profit accrued before completion of the KYC process, will be void.”“Any client of the Company who has not completed the most recent and up-to-date Know Your Customer (KYC) verification, and has not had this verification independently approved, shall not be deemed to possess an active account with the Company.”“Please note that quanttekel.com does not offer prop trading evaluations.”“QT 2 Step Phase 1: 7% Phase 2: 5% 4% daily drawdown, 10% max drawdown, 75% exposure cap during evaluation, 14-day payout cycle, 4 minimum days plus 2 days of +0.5%.”“QT 2 STEP / $25K $80 $100 7% profit target on phase 1, 5% on phase 2, the best spreads in the industry and relaxed rules setting you up for success - the start of your pathway to the QT Capital program. 60% off everything with code COUNTDOWN - FREE half-size account on purchase (Instant issued at payout) auto applied Start Trading Step 1 Profit Target 7% Step 2 Profit Target 5% Daily Drawdown 3% Max Drawdown 6%”“All QTFunded services are provided by Quant Tekel SVG (St. Vincent and the Grenadines), an offshore entity. Customers contract with Quant Tekel SVG, not Quant Tekel Ltd.”“Quant Tekel LLC – 3984 LLC 2025 provides virtual proprietary trading programs through simulated environments.”We read this page in full. None of these appears anywhere in it:
Scorecard
9Trails on daily closes and never stops
The group holds a real licence, but you contract offshore
A per-request cap well below the account size
The risk rule changes after you have paid
Established, with a normal review profile
Each axis is scored 0–5 against a published scale. The line under each bar is the rung this firm landed on — not our summary of it, the scale entry itself.
The score is published anyway, because it is the honest picture: a firm can be strong on four axes and still be disqualified on one mechanism. A disqualifier is not a low grade — it is a rule we will not trade under at any price.
Plan by plan
5 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →
Its two surfaces disagree about the floor on the same day: "4% daily drawdown, 10% max drawdown" in the rules table, "Daily Drawdown 3% Max Drawdown 6%" on the card that sells it. The table's figures are the ones recorded. Neither says whether the floor moves — this row writes neither "fixed" nor "trailing" where three sibling rows write one of them.
The only plan whose rules row carries no drawdown at all: "Same evaluation targets" equalises the targets and says nothing about the floor. Its own checkout card was never opened, so that blank is ours as much as theirs. What it does state is the best sentence on the site — "no funded profit cap per cycle" — and it is the only published difference from QT 2 Step.
"3% fixed daily drawdown, 6% trailing max drawdown" — the firm distinguishes the two regimes inside one sentence and never says where the trailing one stops, or what either is measured on. The first withdrawal needs "5 minimum trading days, 5% minimum profit before withdrawal", so the chasing floor is carried at least that long. The sentence this row used to answer that with is in no saved page. Its ceiling is not the advertised $300K: "Instant Funded capped separately at $100,000".
Both floors trail — "3% daily trailing drawdown, 6% max trailing drawdown" — with no stopping point published for either, and it is the one row of five that omits the payout cadence its siblings all state. The funded account's loss limit is never restated, so the only figures in existence are the evaluation ones. The shop calls it "QT 1 Step (Pay when funded)"; the rules table calls it QT 1 Step BNPL.
"4% fixed daily drawdown, 8% max drawdown": the firm labels the daily limit and leaves the maximum bare in the same sentence, two rows below one that reads "6% trailing max drawdown". Sold on "on-demand payouts once requirements are met", with those requirements published nowhere.
Trustpilot
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
0/5
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
0/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
2/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.we did not read this stage0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
Profit targetThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Days you have to finish · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseThey do not say.no changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstThey do not say.no changeno change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.no changeno change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowedThey do not say.no changewe did not read this stage0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
the document they themselves point at is not there
How large it can getThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.we did not read this stage0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
Profit targetThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive · Days you have to finish · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
we did not read enough to sayThe loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
What makes the loss limit rise · What the limit is measured against · Where the limit stops rising · Total loss allowed · Daily limit
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · What breaking the consistency rule costs · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
the document they themselves point at is not there
How large it can getThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveNo such thing in this plan.—
“QT Instant Funded No evaluation phase 3% fixed daily drawdown, 6% trailing max drawdown, 5 minimum trading days, 5% minimum profit before withdrawal, 25% consistency rule, 80% split.”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishNo such thing in this plan.—
“QT Instant Funded No evaluation phase 3% fixed daily drawdown, 6% trailing max drawdown, 5 minimum trading days, 5% minimum profit before withdrawal, 25% consistency rule, 80% split.”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inNo such thing in this plan.—
“QT Instant Funded No evaluation phase 3% fixed daily drawdown, 6% trailing max drawdown, 5 minimum trading days, 5% minimum profit before withdrawal, 25% consistency rule, 80% split.”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
Profit targetNo such thing in this plan.—
“QT Instant Funded No evaluation phase 3% fixed daily drawdown, 6% trailing max drawdown, 5 minimum trading days, 5% minimum profit before withdrawal, 25% consistency rule, 80% split.”Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowedThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · Can it refuse without giving a reason
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
the document they themselves point at is not there
How large it can getThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
Profit targetThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Days you have to finish · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseThey do not say.we did not read this stage0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstThey do not say.we did not read this stage0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.we did not read this stage0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowedThey do not say.no change0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Days before you can ask for money · Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · What breaking the consistency rule costs · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
the document they themselves point at is not there
How large it can getThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
Profit targetThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Days you have to finish · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowedThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
the document they themselves point at is not there
How large it can getThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
The rules in writing
we did not read enough to sayCould you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?
Where the rule that binds you is publishedThey do not say.0/4
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Two official pages that disagree
the daily limit · costs money
“QT 2 Step Phase 1: 7% Phase 2: 5% 4% daily drawdown, 10% max drawdown, 75% exposure cap during evaluation, 14-day payout cycle, 4 minimum days plus 2 days of +0.5%.”“QT 2 STEP / $25K $80 $100 7% profit target on phase 1, 5% on phase 2, the best spreads in the industry and relaxed rules setting you up for success - the start of your pathway to the QT Capital program. 60% off everything with code COUNTDOWN - FREE half-size account on purchase (Instant issued at payout) auto applied Start Trading Step 1 Profit Target 7% Step 2 Profit Target 5% Daily Drawdown 3% Max Drawdown 6%”the drawdown rule · costs money
“QT 2 Step Phase 1: 7% Phase 2: 5% 4% daily drawdown, 10% max drawdown, 75% exposure cap during evaluation, 14-day payout cycle, 4 minimum days plus 2 days of +0.5%.”“QT 2 STEP / $25K $80 $100 7% profit target on phase 1, 5% on phase 2, the best spreads in the industry and relaxed rules setting you up for success - the start of your pathway to the QT Capital program. 60% off everything with code COUNTDOWN - FREE half-size account on purchase (Instant issued at payout) auto applied Start Trading Step 1 Profit Target 7% Step 2 Profit Target 5% Daily Drawdown 3% Max Drawdown 6%”who stands behind the account · costs money
“All QTFunded services are provided by Quant Tekel SVG (St. Vincent and the Grenadines), an offshore entity. Customers contract with Quant Tekel SVG, not Quant Tekel Ltd.”“Quant Tekel LLC – 3984 LLC 2025 provides virtual proprietary trading programs through simulated environments.”Can it change the rules without notice · Is the binding document dated
The company behind it
If it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?
The company you contract withQuant Tekel SVGno change4/4
“All QTFunded services are provided by Quant Tekel SVG (St. Vincent and the Grenadines), an offshore entity. Customers contract with Quant Tekel SVG, not Quant Tekel Ltd.”With no named company there is nobody to sue.
Where it is registeredSt. Vincent and the Grenadinesno change0.40/2
“All QTFunded services are provided by Quant Tekel SVG (St. Vincent and the Grenadines), an offshore entity. Customers contract with Quant Tekel SVG, not Quant Tekel Ltd.”A claim in the Czech Republic and a claim in St Vincent are not the same claim.
Its registration numberwe did not read this stageThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What turns a name into something checkable in a public register.
Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.
That company owns the brand · The people behind it are named
The market
Do your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?
What the funded account isThey do not say.0/4
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The question that separates a firm that earns when you lose from one that earns when you last.
Conditions to reach a real marketNo such thing in this plan.—
“QTFunded.com does not offer brokerage, CFD trading, or live market access to clients in any jurisdiction.”Promising a route to a real market without publishing the conditions is promising nothing.
Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.
We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.