RebelsFunding
Read plan by plan, the floor is not the problem: every evaluation limit is anchored to the opening balance — 10% total across Copper, Bronze and Silver, 6% on the two plans with no daily stop — and the word trailing appears on none of the twelve pages saved. What is missing is the other half. No drawdown figure exists anywhere for the account that actually pays, because the contract hands "rules, eligibility criteria, trading restrictions, risk parameters and reward or commission conditions" to a separate RCF contract signed later with a second company, FRCSM, s.r.o., whose registration number the site never prints. And the shop tells you to "complete the evaluation to qualify for a funded account" while clause 1.9.5 says passing "does not create an automatic, guaranteed or unconditional entitlement to an RCF Account, RCF contract, payout" — you "may only be recommended as a candidate for further review".
Two more gaps the reader pays for. The one-phase Gold is sold on "During the training phase, there is no daily drawdown limit" and the next line of the same conditions block reads "After funding (RCF account), the daily drawdown is set at 4% of the day's starting equity": the rule you are tested under is not the rule you are paid under. And the banner over all five products promises "our 200% refund model" while clause 6.15 gives the 200% to the four-phase plan alone and Gold "1-phase RF Training Program: 0%". Against all that: the contract carries an effective date and says which version it replaces, the FAQ commits in writing to no charge beyond the catalogue price, and every evaluation figure is readable before paying. None of the prices are — the size selector on each product page is JavaScript our copy did not capture, which is our gap and not theirs.
Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.
Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.
Disqualified for
Drawdown changes when funded
Sold under one rule, traded under a harder one. The account you qualified for is not the account you are given, and the difference is only legible after you have paid.
What they published
“During the training phase, there is no daily drawdown limit. After funding (RCF account), the daily drawdown is set at 4% of the day’s starting equity, recorded at 09:00 PM UTC.”“Successful completion of an RF program, phase or Evaluation does not create an automatic, guaranteed or unconditional entitlement to an RCF Account, RCF contract, payout, live account, employment, partnership, investment service or any other regulated financial service. The Customer may only be considered for a further assessment.”“The Customer acknowledges that rules, eligibility criteria, trading restrictions, risk parameters and reward or commission conditions applicable to any RCF cooperation may differ from the rules applicable during RF Services or the evaluation stage and are governed by separate RCF contractual terms.”Scorecard
9Trails on live equity, then freezes at your starting balance
A named company, but no financial regulator anywhere — or a light-touch one only
A lifetime ceiling, or a rule that can block payment
Two official channels disagree on a number that matters
Short history, or a sharply polarised review profile
Each axis is scored 0–5 against a published scale. The line under each bar is the rung this firm landed on — not our summary of it, the scale entry itself.
The score is published anyway, because it is the honest picture: a firm can be strong on four axes and still be disqualified on one mechanism. A disqualifier is not a low grade — it is a rule we will not trade under at any price.
Plan by plan
5 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →
Four exams at 5% each — 20% of profit in total — against a floor fixed at 10% of the opening balance and a 5% daily limit measured on equity. The evaluation half is the most honest product this firm sells: the limit is anchored to the starting capital, worked through with an example, and does not move. The funded half publishes no drawdown at all. Leverage 1:200 with no instrument named, and clause 7.4 lets the firm cut it to 1:5.
Copper minus one exam: 15% of profit across three phases, the same 10% fixed floor and the same 5% daily. It is the only plan whose conditions block never prints a leverage figure, and the only one that promises its fee refund twice on one page — up to 100% in the introduction, 150% in the advantages block, and 150% again in clause 6.15.
Two exams, and the price of the shorter route is the target: 8% then 5%, on the same 10% fixed floor and 5% daily. The split floor drops to 75% under a card that still reads up to 90% — the same headline Copper and Bronze carry at 80%.
The plan the disqualifier is about. Sold on having no daily limit, and the next line of the same conditions block gives the funded account one, at 4% of the day's starting equity. One exam at 10% against 6% of total room — the tightest ceiling of the five — and the only plan clause 6.15 refunds nothing to, under a shop banner advertising a 200% refund model. To its credit it is the one plan that puts the absence of a minimum-days rule in writing.
The firm's half-instant: one paid round at 10%, the whole fee back on passing it — the only plan whose refund does not wait for a commission payment — and then eight levels of automatic scaling, 60% for every further 10% of profit, up to $530,000. It is also the plan that spends almost its entire life on the account whose rules are not published: the only floor it prints, 6%, is bound by its own sentence to the training account, and what the limit is measured against at level 3 or level 8 is stated nowhere.
Trustpilot
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
1/5
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
0/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
0/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey do not say.no changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.no changeno change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target5%no changeno change—
“The goal in this training program is to achieve a 5% profit in each phase.”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno changeno changeThey do not say.0/3
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno changeno changeThey do not say.0/2
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit5%, measured on live equity, open trades includedno changeno changeThey do not say.0/2
“Within one trading day (24 hours), your account must not drop by more than 5%. The starting equity is set at 09:00 PM UTC time.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed10%no changeno changeThey do not say.0/1
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no changeno changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be held30 secondsno changeno change60 seconds—
“Evaluation trades must remain open for at least 30 seconds.”“It includes RCF-specific risk, news and minimum 60-second trade-duration rules and may generate an eligible RCF reward.”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Leverage1:200by instrument
no changeno changeThey do not say.—
by instrument
“During trading, the leverage on your trading account will be set to a maximum of 1:200.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How large it can get3.00× where you started, once—
“In addition, upon meeting certain conditions, successful traders will have their trading account increased by up to 200% of the initial value!”Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey do not say.no changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.no changeno change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target5%no changeno change—
“The goal in this training program is to achieve a 5% profit in each phase.”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno changeno changeThey do not say.0/3
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno changeno changeThey do not say.0/2
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit5%, measured on live equity, open trades includedno changeno changeThey do not say.0/2
“Within one trading day (24 hours), your account must not drop by more than 5%. The starting equity is set at 09:00 PM UTC time.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed10%no changeno changeThey do not say.0/1
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no changeno changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be held30 secondsno changeno change60 seconds—
“Evaluation trades must remain open for at least 30 seconds.”“It includes RCF-specific risk, news and minimum 60-second trade-duration rules and may generate an eligible RCF reward.”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How large it can get3.00× where you started, once—
“That's not all! Once the conditions are met, we will increase the trading account of successful traders up to 200% of the initial value!”Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey do not say.no change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.no change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target8%5%—
“To successfully meet the target profit condition in this program, you need to generate a profit of 8% in the first phase and then 5% in the second phase of the training program.”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno changeThey do not say.0/3
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno changeThey do not say.0/2
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit5%, measured on live equity, open trades includedno changeThey do not say.0/2
“Within one trading day (24 hours), your account must not drop by more than 5%. The starting equity is set at 09:00 PM UTC time.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed10%no changeThey do not say.0/1
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be held30 secondsno change60 seconds—
“Evaluation trades must remain open for at least 30 seconds.”“It includes RCF-specific risk, news and minimum 60-second trade-duration rules and may generate an eligible RCF reward.”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Leverage1:100by instrument
no changeThey do not say.—
by instrument
“During trading, the leverage on your trading account will be set to a maximum of 1:100.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How large it can get3.00× where you started, once—
“That's not all! Once the conditions are met, we will increase the trading account of successful traders up to 200% of the initial value!”Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey state there is none.2/2
“During the evaluation phase, there is no daily drawdown limit, allowing you to focus on overall performance instead of short-term fluctuations. Traders are not limited by the number of trading days, only by the required number of trades.”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target10%—
“The target in this training program is to verify the trader's skills in one phase, and to successfully complete it, a profit of 10% is required.”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allThey do not say.0/3
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedThey do not say.0/2
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey state there is none.4%, measured on live equity, open trades included0.96/2
“During the training phase, there is no daily drawdown limit.”“After funding (RCF account), the daily drawdown is set at 4% of the day’s starting equity, recorded at 09:00 PM UTC.”A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed6%They do not say.0/1
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be held30 seconds60 seconds—
“Evaluation trades must remain open for at least 30 seconds.”“It includes RCF-specific risk, news and minimum 60-second trade-duration rules and may generate an eligible RCF reward.”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Leverage1:50by instrument
They do not say.—
by instrument
“During trading, the leverage on your trading account will be set to a maximum of 1:50.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How large it can get3.00× where you started, once—
“That's not all! Once the conditions are met, we will increase the trading account of successful traders up to 200% of the initial value!”Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target10%—
“In the first training phase, you must achieve a 10% profit in order to be eligible for a 100% refund of the training phase fee.”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allThey do not say.0/3
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedThey do not say.0/2
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey state there is none.They do not say.0/2
“You are not limited by the daily drawdown, only by maximum drawdown.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed6%They do not say.0/1
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 6% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,400 USD.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be held30 seconds60 seconds—
“Evaluation trades must remain open for at least 30 seconds.”“It includes RCF-specific risk, news and minimum 60-second trade-duration rules and may generate an eligible RCF reward.”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Leverage1:50by instrument
They do not say.—
by instrument
“During trading, the leverage on your trading account will be set to a maximum of 1:50.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Limit on position sizeThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
What makes the account growprofit—
“In this program, your account automatically scales by 60% for every 10% profit achieved, up to level 8, with a maximum funding of $530,000 USD.”How large it can get$530,000—
“In this program, your account automatically scales by 60% for every 10% profit achieved, up to level 8, with a maximum funding of $530,000 USD.”Where the path endsThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
The rules in writing
Could you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?
Where the rule that binds you is publishedThey do not say.0/4
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.
Can it change the rules without noticeThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The clause that makes every dated verdict perishable, including ours. Near-universal, so not fatal.
Is the binding document datedThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Without a date you cannot tell whether the rule you read is the rule they apply.
Two official pages that disagree
the payout terms · costs money
“Choose a prop trading program and complete the evaluation to qualify for a funded account.”“Successful completion of any RF Service, challenge, evaluation phase or training programme does not create an automatic, guaranteed or unconditional entitlement to an RCF Account, RCF contract, payout, live account, employment relationship, partnership, investment service or any other regulated financial service. A Customer may only be recommended as a candidate for further review.”the fees · costs money
“Start trading with flexible rules and our 200% refund model”“B. 1-phase RF Training Program: 0%”the fees · costs money
“Moreover, during your progression through the training program, we will refund you up to 100% of this fee!”“If you successfully achieve the goals, you will get back 150% of your entry fees with your first reward.”the account size or the speed · costs credibility
“You have the freedom of unlimited time! You have the freedom to conquer 2 phases in a single day, or take the challenge and traverse a phase over half a year—it's all about your personal approach and unique strategy!”“The RF service in the training trading platform lasts for 999 calendar days from the date of activation in each phase, regardless of whether it is a 1-phase, 2-phase, 3-phase, or 4-phase RF service, further specified on the website HERE , with the exception of the RF Instant Educational Training Program, which has no time limit.”the account size or the speed · costs credibility
“You have starting accounts from 1,000 USD to 20,000 USD with the possibility of gradual increase up to 530,000 USD for the most successful!”“Level 0 5,000 10,000 20,000”The company behind it
If it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?
The company you contract withThey do not say.no change0/4
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
With no named company there is nobody to sue.
Where it is registeredSlovakiaThey do not say.0/2
“Legal relationships established by or connected with these Terms, including non-contractual relationships, are governed by the law of the Slovak Republic. Any dispute arising in connection with these Terms or a related agreement falls within the jurisdiction of the competent Slovak court.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A claim in the Czech Republic and a claim in St Vincent are not the same claim.
Its registration number48 116 700They do not say.0/2
“Company ID: 48 116 700, registered in the Commercial Register, Section Sro, Insert No. 166242/B”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What turns a name into something checkable in a public register.
That company owns the brandThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Signing with a company other than the brand’s owner separates who sold to you from who answers to you.
Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.
The people behind it are named
The market
Do your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?
What the funded account isThey do not say.0/4
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The question that separates a firm that earns when you lose from one that earns when you last.
Conditions to reach a real marketNo such thing in this plan.—
“Customers do not deposit trading capital, and orders placed on Evaluation or RCF Accounts are not live customer orders.”Promising a route to a real market without publishing the conditions is promising nothing.
Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.
We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.