RebelsFunding
DISQUALIFIEDRead plan by plan, the floor is not the problem: every evaluation limit is anchored to the opening balance — 10% total across Copper, Bronze and Silver, 6% on the two plans with no daily stop — and the word trailing appears on none of the twelve pages saved. What is missing is the other half. No drawdown figure exists anywhere for the account that actually pays, because the contract hands "rules, eligibility criteria, trading restrictions, risk parameters and reward or commission conditions" to a separate RCF contract signed later with a second company, FRCSM, s.r.o., whose registration number the site never prints. And the shop tells you to "complete the evaluation to qualify for a funded account" while clause 1.9.5 says passing "does not create an automatic, guaranteed or unconditional entitlement to an RCF Account, RCF contract, payout" — you "may only be recommended as a candidate for further review".
Two more gaps the reader pays for. The one-phase Gold is sold on "During the training phase, there is no daily drawdown limit" and the next line of the same conditions block reads "After funding (RCF account), the daily drawdown is set at 4% of the day's starting equity": the rule you are tested under is not the rule you are paid under. And the banner over all five products promises "our 200% refund model" while clause 6.15 gives the 200% to the four-phase plan alone and Gold "1-phase RF Training Program: 0%". Against all that: the contract carries an effective date and says which version it replaces, the FAQ commits in writing to no charge beyond the catalogue price, and every evaluation figure is readable before paying. None of the prices are — the size selector on each product page is JavaScript our copy did not capture, which is our gap and not theirs.
Your account’s floor
The balance below which the firm closes the account. Each item with the firm’s own sentence. Read on the challenge: RF Copper 4-Phase Training Program.
- Maximum total loss · phase 1stated
- 10%
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”
read on 2026-08-04 · rebelsfunding.com · saved copy - Maximum loss in one day · phase 1stated
- 5% · with your live balance
“Within one trading day (24 hours), your account must not drop by more than 5%. The starting equity is set at 09:00 PM UTC time.”
read on 2026-08-04 · rebelsfunding.com · saved copy - When the floor moves · phase 1stated
- it does not move
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”
read on 2026-08-04 · rebelsfunding.com · saved copy - What a payout does to itthey are silent
- we read that page and it does not sayread on 2026-08-04 · rebelsfunding.com · saved copy
Crossed one of the seven hard bars. Open the row and it names which one, with the mechanism spelled out. This is not a low grade — no quantity of virtue elsewhere buys it off, which is why it carries no rank at all.
Disqualified for
Drawdown changes when funded
Sold under one rule, traded under a harder one. The account you qualified for is not the account you are given, and the difference is only legible after you have paid.
What they published
“During the training phase, there is no daily drawdown limit. After funding (RCF account), the daily drawdown is set at 4% of the day’s starting equity, recorded at 09:00 PM UTC.”“Successful completion of an RF program, phase or Evaluation does not create an automatic, guaranteed or unconditional entitlement to an RCF Account, RCF contract, payout, live account, employment, partnership, investment service or any other regulated financial service. The Customer may only be considered for a further assessment.”“The Customer acknowledges that rules, eligibility criteria, trading restrictions, risk parameters and reward or commission conditions applicable to any RCF cooperation may differ from the rules applicable during RF Services or the evaluation stage and are governed by separate RCF contractual terms.”Scorecard
9Trails on live equity, then freezes at your starting balance
A named company, but no financial regulator anywhere — or a light-touch one only
A lifetime ceiling, or a rule that can block payment
Two official channels disagree on a number that matters
Short history, or a sharply polarised review profile
Each axis is scored 0–5 against a published scale. The line under each bar is the rung this firm landed on — not our summary of it, the scale entry itself.
The score is published anyway, because it is the honest picture: a firm can be strong on four axes and still be disqualified on one mechanism. A disqualifier is not a low grade — it is a rule we will not trade under at any price.
Plan by plan
5 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →
Four exams at 5% each — 20% of profit in total — against a floor fixed at 10% of the opening balance and a 5% daily limit measured on equity. The evaluation half is the most honest product this firm sells: the limit is anchored to the starting capital, worked through with an example, and does not move. The funded half publishes no drawdown at all. Leverage 1:200 with no instrument named, and clause 7.4 lets the firm cut it to 1:5.
Copper minus one exam: 15% of profit across three phases, the same 10% fixed floor and the same 5% daily. It is the only plan whose conditions block never prints a leverage figure, and the only one that promises its fee refund twice on one page — up to 100% in the introduction, 150% in the advantages block, and 150% again in clause 6.15.
Two exams, and the price of the shorter route is the target: 8% then 5%, on the same 10% fixed floor and 5% daily. The split floor drops to 75% under a card that still reads up to 90% — the same headline Copper and Bronze carry at 80%.
The plan the disqualifier is about. Sold on having no daily limit, and the next line of the same conditions block gives the funded account one, at 4% of the day's starting equity. One exam at 10% against 6% of total room — the tightest ceiling of the five — and the only plan clause 6.15 refunds nothing to, under a shop banner advertising a 200% refund model. To its credit it is the one plan that puts the absence of a minimum-days rule in writing.
The firm's half-instant: one paid round at 10%, the whole fee back on passing it — the only plan whose refund does not wait for a commission payment — and then eight levels of automatic scaling, 60% for every further 10% of profit, up to $530,000. It is also the plan that spends almost its entire life on the account whose rules are not published: the only floor it prints, 6%, is bound by its own sentence to the training account, and what the limit is measured against at level 3 or level 8 is stated nowhere.
Trustpilot
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
1/5
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
0/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
0/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey do not say.no changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inThey do not say.no changeno change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target5%no changeno change—
“The goal in this training program is to achieve a 5% profit in each phase.”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno changeno changeThey do not say.0/3
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno changeno changeThey do not say.0/2
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit5%, measured on live equity, open trades includedno changeno changeThey do not say.0/2
“Within one trading day (24 hours), your account must not drop by more than 5%. The starting equity is set at 09:00 PM UTC time.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed10%no changeno changeThey do not say.0/1
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“The overall drawdown on the account is set at 10% of the starting capital on the training account and is bound both to closed and open trades. Example: The equity on an account of 10,000 USD must not be less than 9,000 USD.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no changeno changeno change0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for moneyThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How long your money is theirs.
Most one withdrawal can pay youThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
$2,000 is generous on a $25K account and a joke on a $200K one, so it is measured as a share and at the worst size sold.
Does that cap rise with the accountThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.no changeno changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not