WeGetFunded
Read plan by plan on 4 August, in French, and the floor is the good news: it does not get worse when the money arrives, and asking for money does not move it. Challenge 1 ÉTAPE runs 4% End-of-Day at both stages and stops climbing at the opening balance — "Dans le cadre du compte financé 1 Step, le drawdown est suiveur en End of Day (EOD) jusqu'à ce qu'il soit entièrement couvert, puis il devient fixe au solde initial." Challenge 2 ÉTAPES runs a flat 10% that never trails at all, and both programmes answer the withdrawal question the same way: "Après un retrait, le drawdown reste fixé au solde initial et ne se recalcule pas." What the binding document never says is what share of the profit those two funded accounts pay. It writes 70/30 for Instant Funded and 80/20 for the Live programme, and for the two challenges it writes nothing, while the homepage sells up to 100%.
The whole rule book is one document, /legal/terms, whose Section 18 is an annex of parameter tables programme by programme and which the firm dates 18 May 2026. It is also the only one of the ten saved pages that contains a loss limit at all. The FAQ is contractual — "Les FAQ font partie intégrante du contrat et précisent les règles opérationnelles" — and all three captures of it are a JavaScript accordion carrying every question and no answer, so the payout frequency, the withdrawal procedure and the four articles named after the four programmes are unread rather than unstated, and none of them counts against the firm here. What does count is how often two of its own pages disagree. The homepage sells no deadline, "Pas de compte à rebours, pas de pression artificielle", and clause 24.5 reads "Le challenge est automatiquement désactivé après une période d'un (1) an." The same contract defines a valid trading day at 0,30% of initial capital in Section 17.3 and at 0,50% in both funded tables without saying which prevails, and seven such days stand between a funded account and its first payout. The footer registers the company in Saint Lucia, the privacy policy puts the same brand at a Dubai address, Section 29 gives a third company at a fourth address, and the footer rents an office in Tbilisi. The About page claims "Mise en place d'un cadre régulé" while no page names a regulator, a licence or any financial registration. And every footer says the firm is no broker and that participants place no live market orders, while clause 18.6 puts every funded trader under a Live programme run through a partner broker it never names. Entering it changes what a payout is: the eligible amount is uplifted to 110%, twenty per cent of that is paid in cash, and "Cinquante pour cent (50%) du Payout Majoré sont affectés au compte Live du trader sans donner droit à un versement en direct sur le compte bancaire." Three further products — 90/10, 100% Split and One Day Pass — sit on the homepage selector with no rules on any archived page and are listed unread. One number is missing here on purpose: the payout caps are published in full for all three funded programmes and are written with a space as the thousands separator, so no transcription of them can be tied back to the sentence that carries them. They are quoted in full in the rules file instead.
Not enough published data to simulate this firm’s floor.
We read this firm plan by plan, and its numbers are published — they live in the derived evidence on its card, not in the five-axis sieve the tiers are ranked on. The grade here is the evidence itself: three answers and a payment-promise score, each computed from the firm’s own documents with a citation behind every input. What it does not have is the hand-written scorecard a tier requires.
Graded from the evidence
Can you even pass?
3/5
Can you keep the money?
2/5
Is anyone behind it?
3/5
What they published
“Dans le cadre du compte financé 1 Step, le drawdown est suiveur en End of Day (EOD) jusqu'à ce qu'il soit entièrement couvert, puis il devient fixe au solde initial. Après un retrait, le drawdown reste fixé au solde initial et ne se recalcule pas.”“Le drawdown maximum est le montant total que vous pouvez perdre par rapport au solde initial de votre compte. Contrairement au drawdown journalier qui se réinitialise chaque jour, le drawdown maximum s'applique à toute votre période de trading.”“Cinquante pour cent (50%) du Payout Majoré sont affectés au compte Live du trader sans donner droit à un versement en direct sur le compte bancaire.”Plan by plan
7 of this firm’s challenges were read plan by plan, with a citation behind every answer. See them side by side →
Bought already funded — the contract answers the exam question with two words, "Challenge : Aucun" — and it is the only programme whose split and leverage the contract publishes: 70/30 and 1:100. It is also the only one whose floor is numbers with no mechanism. Clause 18.1 gives 5% overall and 3% a day and never says whether the 5% trails, what it is measured against or where it stops, and the two paragraphs in the annex that explain those things name the other two programmes. The consistency rule is the tightest the firm sells at 20%, and the payout caps are quoted in euros on accounts named in dollars.
One exam, then a funded account under the same 4% End-of-Day ceiling — the funded paragraph is the challenge paragraph word for word plus one sentence about withdrawals. The limit is rebuilt each night from the equity at 00h00 GMT, only ever upward, and stops for good once the 4% has been covered: their own example blocks the floor of a 100 000 $ account at 100 000 $ as soon as it reaches 106 000 $. No daily loss limit is published at either stage, which is a freedom nobody has put in writing. The reservation is that clause 18.5 lists this funded account's rules in full and never states the profit split, while its sibling clause states one for Instant Funded.
The plainest floor this firm sells: 10% measured from the opening balance, identical across both exams and the funded account, and the contract says in as many words that unlike the daily limit it does not reset. Nothing trails, so nothing has to freeze. Two reservations, and neither is the floor. The contract publishes no profit target for either exam — it publishes the drawdown, the daily loss, the consistency figure and the minimum days, and not the number you have to reach — and, exactly as in 1 ÉTAPE, it never states what share of the profit the funded account pays.
Not bought and not applied for: every funded trader is subject to it and the move is the firm's alone to decide. Clause 18.6 spends five sub-clauses on how the money is divided and never states a loss limit, a daily limit, a consistency figure or a minimum day count, so what closes a Live account is unpublished. Entering it also deactivates the account that got you there. It is graded caution rather than worse because the FAQ article written for this programme is one of the ones that would not open, and judging it from a document that expressly defers to a page we could not read would be judging our own gap.
Trustpilot
We found no Trustpilot profile for this firm.
What this firm published
Everything below is quoted from a page we opened, on the date shown. The quotes are in the firm’s own language, exactly as published — never edited, never shortened, never swapped for a translation. On the Spanish edition our own rendering appears underneath each one, unquoted and marked as ours: the quotation marks on this site mean the words are the firm’s, and nothing we wrote ever wears them. Where we have not read enough to put a number on an axis, we say so instead of guessing.
3/5
Can you even pass?
Almost nobody who pays for an evaluation ever reaches a funded account, so this is the part of the product most customers actually buy. Every firm advertises its profit target; none of them advertises that target next to how much you are allowed to lose while chasing it.
2/5
Can you keep the money?
The drawdown takes the account away; the payout rules take the money. Answered by whichever of the two we can measure and is worse — they are two ways of losing the same thing, so a good half cannot pay for a bad one.
3/5
Is anyone behind it?
A named company, a market, and rules you could read before paying. These three do not substitute for one another — a company you can sue does not stop existing because the account is a simulation — so this is the average of the ones we could measure, not the worst.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveNo such thing in this plan.—
“Challenge : Aucun”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishNo such thing in this plan.—
“Challenge : Aucun”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inNo such thing in this plan.—
“Challenge : Aucun”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
Profit targetNo such thing in this plan.—
“Challenge : Aucun”Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit3%, measured on live equity, open trades included0.60/2
“Perte journalière : 3 %”A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed5%0.25/1
“Drawdown Max : 5 %”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsit delays the payout2.10/3
“Imaginons que votre meilleure journée de trading soit de +300 $. Pour être éligible à un payout, votre P&L total devra atteindre au minimum 1 000 $, afin que cette meilleure journée ne représente pas plus de 30 % de votre P&L total (300 ÷ 0,30 = 1 000 $).”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“Toute violation de la présente section peut entraîner, à la seule discrétion de WeGetFunded : la suspension du compte, la désactivation définitive du service, l'annulation de gains, et/ou le refus de tout paiement, sans que cela n'ouvre droit à remboursement, indemnisation ou compensation.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for money7 days2/2
“Caractéristiques : Jours de trading minimum : 7 jours”How long your money is theirs.
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey state there is none.—
“Trading pendant les news : Autorisé”Mandatory stop-lossThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Minimum time a trade must be heldThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Forced close before the weekendThey state there is none.—
“Overweek : Autorisé”Leverage1:100by instrument
—
by instrument
“Effet de levier : 1:100”No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
Where the path endsat a real market—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to survivefor every $1 you are allowed to lose, you must make $1.52.40/8
“Objectif : 6 % · Perte max : 4 % · Jour de trading min : 2”A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey state there is none.3/3
“Validez votre challenge à votre rythme. Pas de compte à rebours, pas de pression artificielle — seule votre performance compte.”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put in2 days2/2
“Nombre minimum de jours de trading : 2 jours”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsa second attempt is discounted1/2
“Vous échouez ? Relancez votre challenge en un clic à tarif réduit. Apprenez de chaque tentative sans perdre votre élan.”A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit target6%—
“Objectif : 6 % · Perte max : 4 % · Jour de trading min : 2”Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit rises with the day's closing balanceno change1.65/3
“Le drawdown EOD correspond à la perte maximale autorisée , calculée à partir de l'equity de votre compte à la fin de la journée précédente (00h00 GMT). Chaque jour, une nouvelle limite est définie selon votre equity enregistrée à 00h00 GMT. Si cette equity est supérieure au seuil EOD précédent, alors c'est cette nouvelle valeur qui est utilisée pour recalculer le drawdown.”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
Where the limit stops risingat your starting balance3/3
“Dans le cadre du compte financé 1 Step, le drawdown est suiveur en End of Day (EOD) jusqu'à ce qu'il soit entièrement couvert, puis il devient fixe au solde initial. Après un retrait, le drawdown reste fixé au solde initial et ne se recalcule pas.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno change1/2
“Durant la journée suivante, votre compte ne doit jamais descendre en dessous de ce seuil.”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitnothing — the limit stays where it was, down to the balance the account opened with2/2
“Après un retrait, le drawdown reste fixé au solde initial et ne se recalcule pas.”Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.no change0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed4%no change0.25/1
“Pendant la phase Challenge 1 Step, le client s'engage à respecter l'ensemble des règles suivantes : Drawdown Max (End of Day) : 4 %”“Une fois le Challenge 1 Step validé et les frais d'activation réglés, le client accède à un compte financé, soumis aux règles suivantes : Drawdown maximal global (DDM – End of Day) : 4 %”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.it delays the payout0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“Imaginons que votre meilleure journée de trading soit de +300 $. Pour être éligible à un payout, votre P&L total devra atteindre au minimum 1 000 $, afin que cette meilleure journée ne représente pas plus de 30 % de votre P&L total (300 ÷ 0,30 = 1 000 $).”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“Toute violation de la présente section peut entraîner, à la seule discrétion de WeGetFunded : la suspension du compte, la désactivation définitive du service, l'annulation de gains, et/ou le refus de tout paiement, sans que cela n'ouvre droit à remboursement, indemnisation ou compensation.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for money7 days2/2
“Nombre minimum de jours de trading actifs : 7 jours”How long your money is theirs.
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey state there is none.no change—
“Trading pendant les annonces économiques (News) : Autorisé”Mandatory stop-lossThey state there is none.no change—
“NO SL : Autorisé”Minimum time a trade must be heldThey state there is none.no change—
“Trade - 1 minute : Autorisé”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
LeverageThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
Where the path endsat a real market—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
Not the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
How much you must win to surviveThey do not say.0/8
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A profit target only means something next to the room you are given to reach it. Ten per cent to make against ten to lose is a coin flip sold as an exam.
Days you have to finishThey state there is none.no change3/3
“Validez votre challenge à votre rythme. Pas de compte à rebours, pas de pression artificielle — seule votre performance compte.”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put in5 daysno change1.60/2
“Minimum 5 jours de trading”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsa second attempt is discounted1/2
“Vous échouez ? Relancez votre challenge en un clic à tarif réduit. Apprenez de chaque tentative sans perdre votre élan.”A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit targetThey do not say.no change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseit does not move at allno changeno change3/3
“Le drawdown maximum est le montant total que vous pouvez perdre par rapport au solde initial de votre compte. Contrairement au drawdown journalier qui se réinitialise chaque jour, le drawdown maximum s'applique à toute votre période de trading.”A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstlive equity, open trades includedno changeno change1/2
“Par exemple, si le drawdown maximum est de 10 % sur un capital virtuel de 100 000 $, le solde de votre compte ne doit jamais descendre en dessous de 90 000 $.”Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitnothing — the limit stays where it was, down to the balance the account opened with2/2
“Après un retrait, ce seuil reste fixé au solde initial et ne se recalcule pas.”Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limit5%, measured on live equity, open trades includedno changeno change1.20/2
“Par exemple, si la perte journalière autorisée est de 5 % sur un capital virtuel de 100 000 $, vous ne pourrez pas perdre plus de 5 000 $ en une seule journée. La réinitialisation quotidienne est à 00h00 GMT : le drawdown journalier se réinitialise automatiquement chaque jour à 00h00 GMT . À ce moment précis, la valeur de l'equity du compte (solde + gains/pertes latents) est enregistrée. La nouvelle limite de perte journalière est calculée à partir de cette equity.”A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowed10%no changeno change1/1
“Pendant la phase Challenge : Drawdown Max : 10 %”“En funded : Drawdown Max : 10 %”How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingNo such thing in this plan.—
“Le drawdown maximum est le montant total que vous pouvez perdre par rapport au solde initial de votre compte. Contrairement au drawdown journalier qui se réinitialise chaque jour, le drawdown maximum s'applique à toute votre période de trading.”The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
How much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What else a payout changesThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The floor is not the only thing a withdrawal moves, and the rest of it is never on the same page. Position size, the consistency rule and the share you are paid all reset or shift at some firms, and a trader who checked only the drawdown finds out afterwards.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.no changeit delays the payout0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
“Imaginons que votre meilleure journée de trading soit de +300 $. Pour être éligible à un payout, votre P&L total devra atteindre au minimum 1 000 $, afin que cette meilleure journée ne représente pas plus de 30 % de votre P&L total (300 ÷ 0,30 = 1 000 $).”Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“Toute violation de la présente section peut entraîner, à la seule discrétion de WeGetFunded : la suspension du compte, la désactivation définitive du service, l'annulation de gains, et/ou le refus de tout paiement, sans que cela n'ouvre droit à remboursement, indemnisation ou compensation.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Days before you can ask for money7 days2/2
“Minimum 7 jours de trading actifs”How long your money is theirs.
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account
How you may trade
Can you trade the way you actually trade — around the news, over the weekend, at the size and speed you use?
Restriction around the newsThey state there is none.no changeno change—
“Trading News : Autorisé”Mandatory stop-lossThey state there is none.no changeno change—
“NO SL : Autorisé”Minimum time a trade must be heldThey state there is none.no changeno change—
“Trade - 1 minute : Autorisé”Forced close before the weekendThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
LeverageThey do not say.no changeno change—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
No score here, on purpose. The six axes above ask whether the firm can take your money or refuse to pay it. These rules ask something else — whether you can trade your way — and the right weight depends on who is reading: a minimum holding time decides the account for a scalper and is invisible to anyone else, while the weekend rule is the reverse. A single number would be wrong for half of you, and would look decided. The firm’s own sentences are here; the judgement is yours.
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
Where the path endsat a real market—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Days you have to finishNo such thing in this plan.—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”A deadline turns a test of skill into a test of whether the market happened to move during your month.
Trading days you must put inNo such thing in this plan.—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”Cuts both ways: it costs you time, and it also stops an account passing on one lucky afternoon you could never repeat.
A second attempt costsNo such thing in this plan.—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”A free second attempt turns one bad week into a delay instead of another invoice.
Profit targetNo such thing in this plan.—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive
Maximum loss
The loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
What makes the loss limit riseThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A limit that climbs takes back the cushion you already earned.
What the limit is measured againstThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Decides whether a trade that dips and recovers can close an account that ended the day green.
What taking a payout does to the limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Taking your money out should not leave you closer to losing the account.
Daily limitThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
A generous percentage measured on live equity is not generous — it is the same number with a trapdoor under it.
Total loss allowedThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much room you have. Worth little, because almost every firm offers the same.
Where the limit stops risingThey do not say.—
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The difference between a danger with an end date and one that never ends.
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Withdrawals before the account endsThey publish no ceiling.3/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
The cap per withdrawal times how many they allow is the real size of the account. One plan here is sold on a $200,000 banner and closes after five withdrawals of $2,100.
What breaking the consistency rule costsThey do not say.0/3
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Weighted by what it costs, not by existing: reading plan by plan, no consistency rule ever closed an account — they postponed the withdrawal.
Can it refuse without giving a reasonyes — it reserves that right in writing0/3
“Toute violation de la présente section peut entraîner, à la seule discrétion de WeGetFunded : la suspension du compte, la désactivation définitive du service, l'annulation de gains, et/ou le refus de tout paiement, sans que cela n'ouvre droit à remboursement, indemnisation ou compensation.”“We may decline for any reason” is not a rule, it is the absence of one — it makes every other number on this axis conditional on goodwill.
Profit required before the first requestThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
How much you have to make before you can touch anything.
Fee charged to pay youThey do not say.0/1
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
What they charge you to pay you.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Days before you can ask for money · Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · What else a payout changes
How it grows
What makes the account get bigger, how big it can get, and whether the path ends at a real market or at a larger simulation.
Where the path endsat a real market—
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”One of these questions is scored and it is not here. “Does the cap rise with the account” sits on the cash axis, next to the cap itself, because it has a right answer: a bigger account that pays the same cheque has handed you a larger number and the same money. The three below are different. A two-million ceiling is the whole point of the product for one reader and irrelevant to someone who wants one clean payout, so the firm’s sentences are here and the weight is yours.
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
we did not read enough to sayThe loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
What makes the loss limit rise · What the limit is measured against · Where the limit stops rising · What taking a payout does to the limit · Total loss allowed · Daily limit
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Days before you can ask for money · Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · What breaking the consistency rule costs · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
we did not read enough to sayThe loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
What makes the loss limit rise · What the limit is measured against · Where the limit stops rising · What taking a payout does to the limit · Total loss allowed · Daily limit
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Days before you can ask for money · Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · What breaking the consistency rule costs · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you
How hard the test is
we did not read enough to sayNot the profit target on the sales page — that target measured against the room you are given to reach it.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
How much you must win to survive · Profit target · Days you have to finish · Trading days you must put in · A second attempt costs
Maximum loss
we did not read enough to sayThe loss limit that closes your account. Does it sit still, or does it climb behind you as you win?
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
What makes the loss limit rise · What the limit is measured against · Where the limit stops rising · What taking a payout does to the limit · Total loss allowed · Daily limit
Withdrawing
we did not read enough to sayHow much can leave the account, how soon, how often — and whether they can say no.
Below 60% read we publish no number at all, because a grade computed from two facts out of six is not a lenient grade — it is a different measurement wearing the same label.
Days before you can ask for money · Most one withdrawal can pay you · Does that cap rise with the account · Withdrawals before the account ends · What else a payout changes · What breaking the consistency rule costs · Can it refuse without giving a reason · Profit required before the first request · Fee charged to pay you
The rules in writing
Could you read the rule before paying, and can they change it afterwards?
Where the rule that binds you is publishedin the document its own contract points at4/4
“Cette annexe regroupe les règles clés. Pour le détail complet (ex : instruments, plateformes, modalités exactes), se référer à la FAQ officielle du programme.”If the rule that binds you lives in a help article your contract never mentions, you did not sign it.
Can it change the rules without noticeyes, and it says so0.60/3
“Nous nous réservons le droit de mettre à jour, modifier ou remplacer toute partie de ces Conditions de Service en publiant des mises à jour et/ou des modifications sur notre site Web. Il est de votre responsabilité de vérifier régulièrement cette page pour être informé des changements. Votre utilisation continue du site Web après la publication de ces modifications constitue votre acceptation de ces changements.”The clause that makes every dated verdict perishable, including ours. Near-universal, so not fatal.
Is the binding document datedyes2/2
“Dernière mise à jour : 18 mai 2026”Without a date you cannot tell whether the rule you read is the rule they apply.
Two official pages that disagree
the account size or the speed · costs credibility
“Validez votre challenge à votre rythme. Pas de compte à rebours, pas de pression artificielle — seule votre performance compte.”“Le challenge est automatiquement désactivé après une période d'un (1) an.”the payout terms · costs money
“Tradez sur notre plateforme avec un compte démo allant jusqu'à 400 000 $. Obtenez jusqu'à 100 % de vos profits simulés et découvrez une nouvelle façon de valoriser vos performances.”“Dans le cadre du Programme Live, les performances réalisées sur le compte Live sont soumises à un profit split de quatre-vingts pour cent (80%) en faveur du trader et vingt pour cent (20%) en faveur de WGF, sauf mention contraire écrite.”the payout terms · costs money
“Lorsqu'un nombre minimum de jours de trading est requis, un jour peut être comptabilisé comme « valide » si le trader enregistre une variation de performance clôturée en gains de ≥ 0,30 % du capital initial du compte.”“Un jour de trading est considéré comme valide si le trader enregistre une variation de performance clôturée en gains de ≥ 0,50 % du capital initial du compte. Les journées perdantes ou neutres ne sont pas comptabilisées.”who stands behind the account · costs credibility
“WeGetFunded LTD. est une société enregistrée conformément aux lois de Sainte-Lucie, avec le numéro d'enregistrement 2025-00757, et a son siège social au rez-de-chaussée, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Village, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Sainte-Lucie.”“Le responsable du traitement des données personnelles est WeGetFunded, dont le siège social est situé à IFZA Business Park, DDP - 24522 - 001 Dubaï, Émirats Arabes Unis.”whether the account reaches a real market · costs credibility
“Aucun fonds client / Aucun trading en direct : WeGetFunded n'est pas un courtier, un négociant, une bourse ou un conseiller en investissement, et n'accepte ni ne gère les dépôts des clients.”“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”The company behind it
If it goes wrong, which company do you claim against, and under whose laws?
The company you contract withWeGetFunded LTDno change4/4
“Le site web wegetfunded.com est exploité par WeGetFunded LTD.”“WeGetFunded LTD. est une société enregistrée conformément aux lois de Sainte-Lucie, avec le numéro d'enregistrement 2025-00757, et a son siège social au rez-de-chaussée, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Village, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Sainte-Lucie.”With no named company there is nobody to sue.
Where it is registeredwe did not read this stageSaint Lucia1/2
“WeGetFunded LTD. est une société enregistrée conformément aux lois de Sainte-Lucie, avec le numéro d'enregistrement 2025-00757, et a son siège social au rez-de-chaussée, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Village, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Sainte-Lucie.”A claim in the Czech Republic and a claim in St Vincent are not the same claim.
Its registration numberwe did not read this stage2025-007572/2
“WeGetFunded LTD. est une société enregistrée conformément aux lois de Sainte-Lucie, avec le numéro d'enregistrement 2025-00757, et a son siège social au rez-de-chaussée, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Village, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Sainte-Lucie.”What turns a name into something checkable in a public register.
That company owns the brandyes2/2
“Le site web wegetfunded.com est exploité par WeGetFunded LTD.”Signing with a company other than the brand’s owner separates who sold to you from who answers to you.
The people behind it are namedThey do not say.0/2
we read the page that should answer this and it does not
Named people can be looked up. A company on its own cannot always be.
Almost no firm here has a financial regulator, because selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity anywhere. Of the 114 firms we scored by hand, 96 sat in the bottom two rungs of backing for this reason. So we do not count it against anyone — it only adds when a firm genuinely has one.
The market
Do your orders reach a market, or is all of it a simulation?
What the funded account issimulated, with a published route to a live stage2/4
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”The question that separates a firm that earns when you lose from one that earns when you last.
Conditions to reach a real marketnot published0.40/2
“Tout trader financé chez WGF est assujetti au Programme Live. L'évolution d'un trader d'un environnement simulé vers l'environnement Live opéré via le courtier partenaire de WGF relève de la seule appréciation de la propfirm.”Promising a route to a real market without publishing the conditions is promising nothing.
Almost none names a broker or a clearing house either, and that follows from the account being a simulation rather than being a second, separate failing. Charging for both would count one fact twice.
We read the rules of every plan it sells and issued a verdict on each one.